linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mika Penttilä" <mika.penttila@nextfour.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	mhocko@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
	ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v6 PATCH 2/2] mm: mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem in munmap
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 21:34:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f89abbc5-c907-1f72-495c-318011415697@nextfour.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532628614-111702-3-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>



On 26.07.2018 21:10, Yang Shi wrote:
> When running some mmap/munmap scalability tests with large memory (i.e.
>> 300GB), the below hung task issue may happen occasionally.
> INFO: task ps:14018 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>        Tainted: G            E 4.9.79-009.ali3000.alios7.x86_64 #1
>  "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this
> message.
>  ps              D    0 14018      1 0x00000004
>   ffff885582f84000 ffff885e8682f000 ffff880972943000 ffff885ebf499bc0
>   ffff8828ee120000 ffffc900349bfca8 ffffffff817154d0 0000000000000040
>   00ffffff812f872a ffff885ebf499bc0 024000d000948300 ffff880972943000
>  Call Trace:
>   [<ffffffff817154d0>] ? __schedule+0x250/0x730
>   [<ffffffff817159e6>] schedule+0x36/0x80
>   [<ffffffff81718560>] rwsem_down_read_failed+0xf0/0x150
>   [<ffffffff81390a28>] call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x18/0x30
>   [<ffffffff81717db0>] down_read+0x20/0x40
>   [<ffffffff812b9439>] proc_pid_cmdline_read+0xd9/0x4e0
>   [<ffffffff81253c95>] ? do_filp_open+0xa5/0x100
>   [<ffffffff81241d87>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x150
>   [<ffffffff812f824b>] ? security_file_permission+0x9b/0xc0
>   [<ffffffff81242266>] vfs_read+0x96/0x130
>   [<ffffffff812437b5>] SyS_read+0x55/0xc0
>   [<ffffffff8171a6da>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xc5
>
> It is because munmap holds mmap_sem exclusively from very beginning to
> all the way down to the end, and doesn't release it in the middle. When
> unmapping large mapping, it may take long time (take ~18 seconds to
> unmap 320GB mapping with every single page mapped on an idle machine).
>
> Zapping pages is the most time consuming part, according to the
> suggestion from Michal Hocko [1], zapping pages can be done with holding
> read mmap_sem, like what MADV_DONTNEED does. Then re-acquire write
> mmap_sem to cleanup vmas.
>
> But, some part may need write mmap_sem, for example, vma splitting. So,
> the design is as follows:
>         acquire write mmap_sem
>         lookup vmas (find and split vmas)
> 	detach vmas
>         deal with special mappings
>         downgrade_write
>
>         zap pages
> 	free page tables
>         release mmap_sem
>
> The vm events with read mmap_sem may come in during page zapping, but
> since vmas have been detached before, they, i.e. page fault, gup, etc,
> will not be able to find valid vma, then just return SIGSEGV or -EFAULT
> as expected.
>
> If the vma has VM_LOCKED | VM_HUGETLB | VM_PFNMAP or uprobe, they are
> considered as special mappings. They will be dealt with before zapping
> pages with write mmap_sem held. Basically, just update vm_flags.
>
> And, since they are also manipulated by unmap_single_vma() which is
> called by unmap_vma() with read mmap_sem held in this case, to
> prevent from updating vm_flags in read critical section, a new
> parameter, called "skip_flags" is added to unmap_region(), unmap_vmas()
> and unmap_single_vma(). If it is true, then just skip unmap those
> special mappings. Currently, the only place which pass true to this
> parameter is us.
>
> With this approach we don't have to re-acquire mmap_sem again to clean
> up vmas to avoid race window which might get the address space changed.
>
> And, since the lock acquire/release cost is managed to the minimum and
> almost as same as before, the optimization could be extended to any size
> of mapping without incurring significant penalty to small mappings.
>
> For the time being, just do this in munmap syscall path. Other
> vm_munmap() or do_munmap() call sites (i.e mmap, mremap, etc) remain
> intact for stability reason.
>
> With the patches, exclusive mmap_sem hold time when munmap a 80GB
> address space on a machine with 32 cores of E5-2680 @ 2.70GHz dropped to
> us level from second.
>
> munmap_test-15002 [008]   594.380138: funcgraph_entry: |  vm_munmap_zap_rlock() {
> munmap_test-15002 [008]   594.380146: funcgraph_entry:      !2485684 us |    unmap_region();
> munmap_test-15002 [008]   596.865836: funcgraph_exit:       !2485692 us |  }
>
> Here the excution time of unmap_region() is used to evaluate the time of
> holding read mmap_sem, then the remaining time is used with holding
> exclusive lock.
>
> [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/753269/
>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h |  2 +-
>  mm/memory.c        | 41 ++++++++++++++++------
>  mm/mmap.c          | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index a0fbb9f..e4480d8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ void zap_vma_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  void zap_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  		    unsigned long size);
>  void unmap_vmas(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *start_vma,
> -		unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
> +		unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool skip_vm_flags);
>  
>  /**
>   * mm_walk - callbacks for walk_page_range
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 7206a63..6a772bd 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  static void unmap_single_vma(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  		struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start_addr,
>  		unsigned long end_addr,
> -		struct zap_details *details)
> +		struct zap_details *details, bool skip_vm_flags)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start = max(vma->vm_start, start_addr);
>  	unsigned long end;
> @@ -1525,11 +1525,19 @@ static void unmap_single_vma(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  	if (end <= vma->vm_start)
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (vma->vm_file)
> -		uprobe_munmap(vma, start, end);
> +	/*
> +	 * Since unmap_single_vma might be called with read mmap_sem held
> +	 * in munmap optimization, so vm_flags can't be updated in this case.
> +	 * They have been updated before this call with write mmap_sem held.
> +	 * Here if skip_vm_flags is true, just skip the update.
> +	 */
> +	if (!skip_vm_flags) {
> +		if (vma->vm_file)
> +			uprobe_munmap(vma, start, end);
>  
> -	if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP))
> -		untrack_pfn(vma, 0, 0);
> +		if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP))
> +			untrack_pfn(vma, 0, 0);
> +	}
>  
>  	if (start != end) {
>  		if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))) {
> @@ -1546,7 +1554,19 @@ static void unmap_single_vma(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  			 */
>  			if (vma->vm_file) {
>  				i_mmap_lock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
> -				__unmap_hugepage_range_final(tlb, vma, start, end, NULL);
> +				if (!skip_vm_flags) {

Should that be :
	if (skip_vm_flags) {
instead?
 

> +					/*
> +					 * The vma is being unmapped with read
> +					 * mmap_sem.
> +					 * Can't update vm_flags here, it has
> +					 * been updated before this call with
> +					 * write mmap_sem held.
> +					 */
> +					__unmap_hugepage_range(tlb, vma, start,
> +							end, NULL);
> +				} else
> +					__unmap_hugepage_range_final(tlb, vma,
> +							start, end, NULL);
>  				i_mmap_unlock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
>  			}
>  		} else
>
--Mika


  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-26 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-26 18:10 [RFC v6 PATCH 0/2] mm: zap pages with read mmap_sem in munmap for large mapping Yang Shi
2018-07-26 18:10 ` [RFC v6 PATCH 1/2] mm: refactor do_munmap() to extract the common part Yang Shi
2018-08-03  8:53   ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-03 20:47     ` Yang Shi
2018-08-06 13:26       ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-06 16:53         ` Yang Shi
2018-08-07 14:59   ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-07 18:06     ` Yang Shi
2018-07-26 18:10 ` [RFC v6 PATCH 2/2] mm: mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem in munmap Yang Shi
2018-07-26 18:34   ` Mika Penttilä [this message]
2018-07-26 19:03     ` Yang Shi
2018-07-27  8:15   ` Laurent Dufour
2018-07-27 16:18     ` Yang Shi
2018-08-03  9:07   ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-03 21:01     ` Yang Shi
2018-08-06  9:40       ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-06 16:46         ` Yang Shi
2018-08-06 20:41           ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-06 20:48             ` Yang Shi
2018-08-06 20:52               ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-06 22:19                 ` Yang Shi
2018-08-07  5:45                   ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-08  1:51                     ` Yang Shi
2018-08-08  9:22                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-08 17:19                         ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f89abbc5-c907-1f72-495c-318011415697@nextfour.com \
    --to=mika.penttila@nextfour.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).