linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
	bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
	xingxin.hx@openanolis.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/18] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:35:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8a25b5f-4a7d-0891-1152-33f349059b5d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALPaoCgEaT2oax35ezRydUZwL9bMmMFFr2wRqPe4VYAnEQ-GGg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Peter,

On 09/03/2023 13:41, Peter Newman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 6:45 PM James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 06/03/2023 13:14, Peter Newman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 12:34 PM James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Instead, when configuring a counter, could you use the firmware table
>>> value to compute the time when the counter will next be valid and return
>>> errors on read requests received before that?
>>
>> The monitor might get re-allocated, re-programmed and become valid for a different
>> PARTID+PMG in the mean time. I don't think these things should remain allocated over a
>> return to user-space. Without doing that I don't see how we can return-early and make
>> progress.
>>
>> How long should a CSU monitor remain allocated to a PARTID+PMG? Currently its only for the
>> duration of the read() syscall on the file.
>>
>>
>> The problem with MPAM is too much of it is optional. This particular behaviour is only
>> valid for CSU monitors, (llc_occupancy), and then, only if your hardware designers didn't
>> have a value to hand when the monitor is programmed, and need to do a scan of the cache to
>> come up with a result. The retry is only triggered if the hardware sets NRDY.
>> This is also only necessary if there aren't enough monitors for every RMID/(PARTID*PMG) to
>> have its own. If there were enough, the monitors could be allocated and programmed at
>> startup, and the whole thing becomes cheaper to access.
>>
>> If a hardware platform needs time to do this, it has to come from somewhere. I don't think
>> maintaining an epoch based list of which monitor secretly belongs to a PARTID+PMG in the
>> hope user-space reads the file again 'quickly enough' is going to be maintainable.
>>
>> If returning errors early is an important use-case, I can suggest ensuring the MPAM driver
>> allocates CSU monitors up-front if there are enough (today it only does this for MBWU
>> monitors). We then have to hope that folk who care about this also build hardware
>> platforms with enough monitors.
> 
> Thanks, this makes more sense now. Since CSU data isn't cumulative, I
> see how synchronously collecting a snapshot is useful in this situation.
> I was more concerned about understanding the need for the new behavior
> than getting errors back quickly.
> 
> However, I do want to be sure that MBWU counters will never be silently
> deallocated because we will never be able to trust the data unless we
> know that the counter has been watching the group's tasks for the
> entirety of the measurement window.

Absolutely.

The MPAM driver requires the number of monitors to match the value of
resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx(), otherwise 'mbm_local' won't be offered via resctrl.
(see class_has_usable_mbwu() in [0])

If the files exist in resctrl, then a monitor was reserved for this PARTID+PMG, and won't
get allocated for anything else.


[0]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git/commit/?h=mpam/snapshot/v6.2&id=f28d3fefdcf7022a49f62752acbecf180ea7d32f


> Unlike on AMD, MPAM allows software to control which PARTID+PMG the
> monitoring hardware is watching. Could we instead make the user
> explicitly request the mbm_{total,local}_bytes events be allocated to
> monitoring groups after creating them? Or even just allocating the
> events on monitoring group creation only when they're available could
> also be marginably usable if a single user agent is managing rdtgroups.

Hmmmm, what would that look like to user-space?

I'm against inventing anything new here until there is feature-parity where possible
upstream. It's a walk, then run kind of thing.

I worry that extra steps to setup the monitoring on MPAM:resctrl will be missing or broken
in many (all?) software projects if they're not also required on Intel:resctrl.

My plan for hardware with insufficient counters is to make the counters accessible via
perf, and do that in a way that works on Intel and AMD too.


Thanks,

James

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-09 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-13 17:54 [PATCH v2 00/18] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 01/18] x86/resctrl: Track the closid with the rmid James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 02/18] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index James Morse
2023-01-17 18:28   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-03-03 18:33     ` James Morse
2023-01-17 18:29   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-02-02 23:44   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-03 18:33     ` James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 03/18] x86/resctrl: Create helper for RMID allocation and mondata dir creation James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 04/18] x86/resctrl: Move rmid allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare() James Morse
2023-01-17 18:28   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-02-02 23:45   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-03 18:33     ` James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/18] x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID James Morse
2023-01-17 18:53   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-03-03 18:34     ` James Morse
2023-02-02 23:45   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-03 18:34     ` James Morse
2023-03-10 19:57       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 06/18] x86/resctrl: Allow the allocator to check if a CLOSID can allocate clean RMID James Morse
2023-01-17 18:29   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-03-03 18:35     ` James Morse
2023-02-02 23:46   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-03 18:36     ` James Morse
2023-03-10 19:59       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-20 17:12         ` James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/18] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers James Morse
2023-01-17 19:10   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-03-03 18:37     ` James Morse
2023-02-02 23:47   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-06 11:32     ` James Morse
2023-03-08 10:30       ` Peter Newman
2023-03-10 20:00       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 08/18] x86/resctrl: Queue mon_event_read() instead of sending an IPI James Morse
2023-01-17 18:29   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-03-06 11:32     ` James Morse
2023-03-10 20:00       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-02-02 23:47   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-06 11:33     ` James Morse
2023-03-08 16:09       ` James Morse
2023-03-10 20:06         ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-20 17:12           ` James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 09/18] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep James Morse
2023-01-23 13:54   ` Peter Newman
2023-03-06 11:33     ` James Morse
2023-01-23 15:33   ` Peter Newman
2023-03-06 11:33     ` James Morse
2023-03-06 13:14       ` Peter Newman
2023-03-08 17:45         ` James Morse
2023-03-09 13:41           ` Peter Newman
2023-03-09 17:35             ` James Morse [this message]
2023-03-10  9:28               ` Peter Newman
2023-03-20 17:12                 ` James Morse
2023-03-22 13:21                   ` Peter Newman
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/18] x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 11/18] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_mounted checks explicit James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 12/18] x86/resctrl: Move alloc/mon static keys into helpers James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 13/18] x86/resctrl: Make rdt_enable_key the arch's decision to switch James Morse
2023-02-02 23:48   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 14/18] x86/resctrl: Add helpers for system wide mon/alloc capable James Morse
2023-01-25  7:16   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-03-06 11:34     ` James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 15/18] x86/resctrl: Add cpu online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 16/18] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be scheduled on any-but cpu James Morse
2023-02-02 23:49   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-06 11:34     ` James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 17/18] x86/resctrl: Add cpu offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2023-01-13 17:54 ` [PATCH v2 18/18] x86/resctrl: Separate arch and fs resctrl locks James Morse
2023-02-02 23:50   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-06 11:34     ` James Morse
2023-03-11  0:22       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-03-20 17:12         ` James Morse
2023-01-25  7:19 ` [PATCH v2 00/18] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f8a25b5f-4a7d-0891-1152-33f349059b5d@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=xingxin.hx@openanolis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).