From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161067AbWG0Nm0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:42:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161075AbWG0Nm0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:42:26 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]:55879 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161067AbWG0NmZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:42:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n6LtCqbbzJ1C3fwZSLQPu6eECoo1iWwnMUtItqLGc/qZ1rbC774/kpMj5690snFgrnITti7Yh2X0PHxoOUx6y3tXXfeX1wmulTPuhgb6zz+CAxYtKGQmUyvrel/sAvm3uFw1ojSdyQ6jSHNf1HelwHnjH2oFexPYPO5HQOKlGy0= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:42:23 +0000 From: "gmu 2k6" To: "Horst H. von Brand" Subject: Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion Cc: "Luigi Genoni" , "Adrian Bunk" , andrea@cpushare.com, "J. Bruce Fields" , "Hans Reiser" , "Nikita Danilov" , "Rene Rebe" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <200607271330.k6RDUaPC008087@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2870.192.167.206.189.1153998447.squirrel@darkstar.linuxpratico.net> <200607271330.k6RDUaPC008087@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/27/06, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Luigi Genoni wrote: > > [...] > > > Anyway you have a datum. > > Some people need reiser4, period. > > Nope. Some people run kernels that include reiser4. That is all you can > infer, and that I knew beforehand. They are at least 35, and that I'd have > guessed in any case. 35.5 as I'm testing it here on my workstation and it seems to be faster when you test some things involving many copies of large multi-level sourcetree directories each 3 to 6GiB big in size. 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 with Reiser4 looks ok so far and I had no sync() OOPS like the last time with one -mm revision. speed tells us nothing about reliability of course, but compared to ext3 with dir_index,sparse_super Reiser4 seems to handle "du -sh" and "rm -r" much faster and without eating all of the CPU cycles as it finishes quicker although Reiser4 was meant to be CPU-heavy compared to ext*/reiserfs3.