From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759640AbcLATfH (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 14:35:07 -0500 Received: from ec2-52-27-115-49.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com ([52.27.115.49]:59103 "EHLO osg.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751606AbcLATfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 14:35:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] enable O and KBUILD_OUTPUT for kselftest To: Bamvor Zhang Jian References: <20161129115552.8148-1-bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com> <01b97008-3311-7b5b-4424-76bd3d560b40@osg.samsung.com> Cc: "Zhang Jian(Bamvor)" , Michael Ellerman , linux-api , lkml , Kevin Hilman , Mark Brown , Shuah Khan From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:35:01 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/30/2016 08:32 AM, Bamvor Zhang Jian wrote: > Hi, Shuah, Michael > > On 30 November 2016 at 22:17, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 11/29/2016 04:55 AM, bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com wrote: >>> From: Bamvor Jian Zhang >>> >>> Here is my second version for enabling the KBUILD_OUTPUT for kselftest. >>> The first version could be found here[1]. I fix and test all the TARGET >>> in tools/testing/selftest/Makefile. For ppc, I test through fake target. >>> >>> There are six patches in these series. And five of them clean up the >>> existing code. I split the clean up patches into five, hope it is easy >>> to review. >>> >>> selftests: remove duplicated all and clean target >>> selftests: remove useless TEST_DIRS >>> a selftests: add pattern rules >>> A selftests: remove CROSS_COMPILE in dedicated Makefile >>> A selftests: add EXTRA_CLEAN for clean target >>> selftests: enable O and KBUILD_OUTPUT >>> >>> Notes: >>> A: Ack by Michael. >>> a: ack by Michael. Minor update after rebase. >> >> Bamovar/Michael, >> >> Are these rebased to linux-next? Michael was concerned about >> conflicts with powerpc tree. Would rebasing to linux-next help >> avoiding conflicts? > Yes. I rebase to latest linux-next. It is taged as 1128 when I rebase > them yesterday. I fix some conflict when rebase. > Hi Bemovar, These patches don't apply to linux-kselftest next and I can't apply them now. Looks like there are new tests that came through a netdev tree already in linux-next. It does happen when a new feature goes into a tree with the test. So for now we will have to wait on these and when 4.10-rc1 comes out, please rebase it on linux-kselftest latest. I will try to get these into 4.10-rc1 fixes thanks, -- Shuah