From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=tadO=N6=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12242C43441
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:39:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C198320851
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:39:33 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C198320851
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1728166AbeKTADL (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:03:11 -0500
Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:49238 "EHLO mga01.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726211AbeKTADK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:03:10 -0500
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48])
  by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2018 05:39:31 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,252,1539673200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="107502697"
Received: from ahunter-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.130]) ([10.237.72.130])
  by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2018 05:39:29 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] perf tools: Fix for cases where cpumode is
 incorrect or insufficient
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, leo.yan@linaro.org,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
References: <20181106210712.12098-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki,
 Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki
Message-ID: <f988a358-fc72-e758-8fa5-e7bfb0498e60@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:37:37 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181106210712.12098-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 6/11/18 11:07 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Here is V2:
> These patches probably deal with most cases except the one fixed by David
> Miller's "perf callchain: Honour the ordering of
> PERF_CONTEXT_{USER,KERNEL,etc}" patch, and also cat_backtrace() which looks
> like it has the same problem, and the cs-etm fix.

Are these patches ok?