From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752012AbdDMVdY (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:33:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:42906 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751139AbdDMVdV (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:33:21 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 3C9A560DB2 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=tbaicar@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V14 02/10] ras: acpi/apei: cper: generic error data entry v3 per ACPI 6.1 To: Borislav Petkov Cc: christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, robert.moore@intel.com, lv.zheng@intel.com, nkaje@codeaurora.org, zjzhang@codeaurora.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, eun.taik.lee@samsung.com, sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com, labbott@redhat.com, shijie.huang@arm.com, rruigrok@codeaurora.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, tn@semihalf.com, fu.wei@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, bristot@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org, Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com, punit.agrawal@arm.com, astone@redhat.com, harba@codeaurora.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, john.garry@huawei.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com, joe@perches.com, gengdongjiu@huawei.com, xiexiuqi@huawei.com References: <1490729440-32591-1-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org> <1490729440-32591-3-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org> <20170412133447.n2yft7v266v6k6gh@pd.tnic> <8a31ef45-68f6-d444-f174-4a485cccd696@codeaurora.org> <20170413204744.iizyyi32v4hjt3fc@pd.tnic> From: "Baicar, Tyler" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:33:13 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170413204744.iizyyi32v4hjt3fc@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/13/2017 2:47 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 02:30:21PM -0600, Baicar, Tyler wrote: >> I do not agree with this. The struct being passed to this function is >> already named acpi_hest_generic_data in the existing code and all over this >> code is named gdata not just d. > And I'm saying they're too long - the preexisting ones and the ones > you're adding - and impair readability. This whole driver is one > unreadable ugly pile and if I were the maintainer I would never allowed > it in its current form. > > But I don't think it really has a maintainer - poor Rafael has to deal > with it because it is under drivers/acpi/ and that whole RAS firmware > crap got thrown over the wall at some point and now we're stuck with it. > > So this is just my opinion since he asked me to take a look. Okay, that makes sense. I'd prefer to avoid completely re-writing the existing code in this patch set :) Thanks, Tyler -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.