From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Mark Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com>,
Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux-nfc@lists.01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] nfc: mrvl: constify several pointers
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:48:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc52cc72-b9e2-4b30-5dcb-ec50b828f957@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210729104022.47761-12-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
On 29/07/2021 12:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Several functions do not modify pointed data so arguments and local
> variables can be const for correctness and safety.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/fw_dnld.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/i2c.c | 2 +-
> drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c | 2 +-
> drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/nfcmrvl.h | 2 +-
> drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/spi.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/uart.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/fw_dnld.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/fw_dnld.c
> index aaccb8b76b3e..edac56b01fd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/fw_dnld.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/fw_dnld.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static void fw_dnld_timeout(struct timer_list *t)
> }
>
> static int process_state_reset(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> + const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> if (sizeof(nci_pattern_core_reset_ntf) != skb->len ||
> memcmp(skb->data, nci_pattern_core_reset_ntf,
> @@ -145,7 +145,8 @@ static int process_state_reset(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int process_state_init(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static int process_state_init(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> + const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct nci_core_set_config_cmd cmd;
>
> @@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ static void create_lc(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv)
> }
>
> static int process_state_set_ref_clock(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> + const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct nci_core_set_config_cmd cmd;
>
> @@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ static int process_state_set_ref_clock(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> }
>
> static int process_state_set_hi_config(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> + const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> if (sizeof(nci_pattern_core_set_config_rsp) != skb->len ||
> memcmp(skb->data, nci_pattern_core_set_config_rsp, skb->len))
> @@ -232,7 +233,7 @@ static int process_state_set_hi_config(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> }
>
> static int process_state_open_lc(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> + const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> if (sizeof(nci_pattern_core_conn_create_rsp) >= skb->len ||
> memcmp(skb->data, nci_pattern_core_conn_create_rsp,
> @@ -347,7 +348,7 @@ static int process_state_fw_dnld(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> }
>
> static int process_state_close_lc(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> + const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> if (sizeof(nci_pattern_core_conn_close_rsp) != skb->len ||
> memcmp(skb->data, nci_pattern_core_conn_close_rsp, skb->len))
> @@ -358,7 +359,8 @@ static int process_state_close_lc(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int process_state_boot(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static int process_state_boot(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv,
> + const struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> if (sizeof(nci_pattern_proprietary_boot_rsp) != skb->len ||
> memcmp(skb->data, nci_pattern_proprietary_boot_rsp, skb->len))
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/i2c.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/i2c.c
> index 59a529e72d96..6e659e77c8a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/i2c.c
> @@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ static int nfcmrvl_i2c_parse_dt(struct device_node *node,
> static int nfcmrvl_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> {
> + const struct nfcmrvl_platform_data *pdata;
> struct nfcmrvl_i2c_drv_data *drv_data;
> - struct nfcmrvl_platform_data *pdata;
> struct nfcmrvl_platform_data config;
> int ret;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c
> index 6e9e7ce8792c..d8e48bdaf652 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct nfcmrvl_private *nfcmrvl_nci_register_dev(enum nfcmrvl_phy phy,
> void *drv_data,
> struct nfcmrvl_if_ops *ops,
> struct device *dev,
> - struct nfcmrvl_platform_data *pdata)
> + const struct nfcmrvl_platform_data *pdata)
> {
> struct nfcmrvl_private *priv;
> int rc;
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/nfcmrvl.h b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/nfcmrvl.h
> index a715543bc9bf..84fafa95965e 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/nfcmrvl.h
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/nfcmrvl.h
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct nfcmrvl_private *nfcmrvl_nci_register_dev(enum nfcmrvl_phy phy,
> void *drv_data,
> struct nfcmrvl_if_ops *ops,
> struct device *dev,
> - struct nfcmrvl_platform_data *pdata);
> + const struct nfcmrvl_platform_data *pdata);
>
>
> void nfcmrvl_chip_reset(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv);
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/spi.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/spi.c
> index 66696321c645..7b015bb33fc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/spi.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static struct nfcmrvl_if_ops spi_ops = {
> .nci_update_config = nfcmrvl_spi_nci_update_config,
> };
>
> -static int nfcmrvl_spi_parse_dt(struct device_node *node,
> +static int nfcmrvl_spi_parse_dt(const struct device_node *node,
> struct nfcmrvl_platform_data *pdata)
This one is not correct (yet) as it depends on changes in OF/IRQ. I just
found compile configuration which triggers here warning.
Please skip this one patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 10:40 [PATCH 00/12] nfc: constify, continued (part 2) Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 01/12] nfc: constify passed nfc_dev Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 02/12] nfc: mei_phy: constify buffer passed to mei_nfc_send() Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 03/12] nfc: port100: constify several pointers Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 04/12] nfc: trf7970a: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 15:58 ` Mark Greer
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 05/12] nfc: virtual_ncidev: constify pointer to nfc_dev Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 06/12] nfc: nfcsim: constify drvdata (struct nfcsim) Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 07/12] nfc: fdp: drop unneeded cast for printing firmware size in dev_dbg() Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 08/12] nfc: fdp: use unsigned int as loop iterator Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 09/12] nfc: fdp: constify several pointers Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 10/12] nfc: microread: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH 11/12] nfc: mrvl: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 10:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2021-07-29 10:42 ` [PATCH 12/12] nfc: mrvl: constify static nfcmrvl_if_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 00/12] nfc: constify, continued (part 2) patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-07-29 11:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-29 11:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc52cc72-b9e2-4b30-5dcb-ec50b828f957@canonical.com \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=bongsu.jeon@samsung.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfc@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgreer@animalcreek.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).