From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F07C04AB3 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 00:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C808B2081C for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 00:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="ovKbcedl" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727631AbfE1Arm (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 May 2019 20:47:42 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:34496 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727018AbfE1Arm (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 May 2019 20:47:42 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4S0lcS6058548; Mon, 27 May 2019 19:47:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1559004458; bh=2gmAOoHDeD++Du38nkxhcnSPLpCrkGFuL8FipVC7j0w=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ovKbcedlmAPESOFUVymVfva8u0NI/yktjCAWKyLRzXa24bttPmdh3rjpycQYtgfmW pY3Ncb4a7/0zterJ7GvRNU3de9PNoR1PsVr1U0p/gK/ox/PSTKqVy/sTLOXglRHBnO oXzV3V2QxHzaBM3pHMpC1qCXchKDvlLCApxROots= Received: from DLEE115.ent.ti.com (dlee115.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.26]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4S0lcI3080761 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 May 2019 19:47:38 -0500 Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) by DLEE115.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 27 May 2019 19:47:38 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 May 2019 19:47:37 -0500 Received: from [10.250.65.13] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4S0lcWb113887; Mon, 27 May 2019 19:47:38 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx family of RGB drivers To: Rob Herring CC: , , , , , References: <20190523190820.29375-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20190523190820.29375-8-dmurphy@ti.com> <20190524205022.GA9518@bogus> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 19:47:36 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190524205022.GA9518@bogus> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rob On 5/24/19 3:50 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, 23 May 2019 14:08:18 -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: >> Introduce the bindings for the Texas Instruments LP5036, LP5030, LP5024 and >> LP5018 RGB LED device driver. The LP5036/30/24/18 can control RGB LEDs >> individually or as part of a control bank group. These devices have the ability >> to adjust the mixing control for the RGB LEDs to obtain different colors >> independent of the overall brightness of the LED grouping. >> >> Datasheet: >> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lp5024.pdf >> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lp5036.pdf >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.txt | 142 ++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 142 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.txt >> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. I usually provide the tags but in my cover letter I did indicate that these patchsets have changed pretty dramatically so I did not feel right about pulling in anyones tags. Adding your reviewed by on a binding that changed did not seem right to me. Dan