From: mdalam@codeaurora.org
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
boris.brezillon@collabora.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vigneshr@ti.com,
sricharan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:00:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe43b382fd48d7fb494dd66a4b5ac80a@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210211150759.506f3463@xps13>
On 2021-02-11 19:37, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote on Wed,
> 10 Feb 2021 14:31:44 +0530:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 03:09:19AM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>> > From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to
>> > read last codeword. This change will add the READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n
>> > register.
>> >
>> > For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be
>> > use.For last code word READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be
>> > use.
>
> Sorry for the late notice, I think the patch is fine but if you don't
> mind I would like to propose a small change that should simplify your
> patch a lot, see below.
>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mani
>>
>> > ---
>> > [V4]
>> > * Modified condition for nandc_set_read_loc_last() in qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw().
>> > * Added one additional argument "last_cw" to the function config_nand_cw_read()
>> > to handle last code word condition.
>> > * Changed total number of last code word register "NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0" to 4
>> > while doing code word configuration.
>> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> > 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> > index 667e4bf..9484be8 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> > @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
>> > #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_1 0xf24
>> > #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_2 0xf28
>> > #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_3 0xf2c
>> > +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0 0xf40
>> > +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1 0xf44
>> > +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2 0xf48
>> > +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3 0xf4c
>> >
>> > /* dummy register offsets, used by write_reg_dma */
>> > #define NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE 0xdead
>> > @@ -187,6 +191,12 @@ nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_##reg, \
>> > ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \
>> > ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>> >
>> > +#define nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last) \
>> > +nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_##reg, \
>> > + ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) | \
>> > + ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \
>> > + ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>> > +
>
> You could rename the macro nandc_set_read_loc() into
> nandc_set_read_loc_first() or anything else that make sense, then have
> a helper which does:
>
> nandc_set_read_loc()
> {
> if (condition for first)
> return nandc_set_read_loc_first();
> else
> return nandc_set_read_loc_last();
> }
>
Yes this is more precise way & simplify the patch a lot.
But for this i have to change these two macro as a function.
nandc_set_read_loc() & nandc_set_read_loc_last().
Since for last code word register we are using Token Pasting
Operator##.
So if i am implementing like the below.
/* helper to configure location register values */
static void nandc_set_read_loc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, int
reg,
int offset, int size, int is_last, bool last_cw)
{
if (last_cw)
return nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset,
size, is_last);
else
return nandc_set_read_loc_first(nandc, reg, offset,
size, is_last);
}
So here for macro expansion reg should be a value not a variable else
it will be expended like
NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_reg instead of
NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0,1,2,3 etc.
the call for nandc_set_read_loc() as nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0,
read_loc, data_size1, 0, true); ---> for last code word.
nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0, false); ---> for
first three code wrod.
So is this ok for you to convert these two macro into function ?
> And in the rest of your patch you won't have to touch anything else.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-11 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 21:39 [PATCH V4] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register Md Sadre Alam
2021-02-10 9:01 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-02-11 14:07 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-11 19:30 ` mdalam [this message]
2021-02-12 8:19 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-14 21:20 ` mdalam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe43b382fd48d7fb494dd66a4b5ac80a@codeaurora.org \
--to=mdalam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).