linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Smita Koralahalli Channabasappa <skoralah@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp>,
	Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] cper, apei, mce: Pass x86 CPER through the MCA handling chain
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:36:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ffc93b00-acc5-39ff-6df1-96daf1e5eaff@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106120923.GB14914@zn.tnic>

On 11/6/20 6:09 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:49:52AM -0600, Smita Koralahalli wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/apei.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/apei.c
>> index af8d37962586..f56f0bc147e2 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/apei.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/apei.c
>> @@ -51,6 +51,62 @@ void apei_mce_report_mem_error(int severity, struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apei_mce_report_mem_error);
>>   
>> +int apei_smca_report_x86_error(struct cper_ia_proc_ctx *ctx_info, u64 lapic_id)
>> +{
>> +	const u64 *i_mce = ((const u64 *) (ctx_info + 1));
>> +	unsigned int cpu;
>> +	struct mce m;
>> +
>> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SMCA))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * The starting address of the Register Array extracted from BERT
>> +	 * must match with the first expected register in the register
>> +	 * layout of MCAX address space. In SMCA systems this address
>> +	 * corresponds to banks's MCA_STATUS register.
> So which is it "MCAX" or "SMCA"? They both denote the same thing but
> let's stick to one to avoid unnecessary confusion. I'm guessing to
> "SMCA" because it is more wide-spread in the kernel...

Okay I will change it to SMCA.

>> +	 *
>> +	 * The Register array size must be large enough to include all
>> +	 * the SMCA registers which we want to extract.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * The number of registers in the Register Array is determined
>> +	 * by Register Array Size/8 as defined in UEFI spec v2.8, sec
>> +	 * N.2.4.2.2. The register layout is fixed and currently the raw
>> +	 * data in the register array includes 6 SMCA registers which the
>> +	 * kernel can extract.
>> +	 */
>> +
>> +	if ((ctx_info->msr_addr & MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_STATUS) !=
>> +	    MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_STATUS || ctx_info->reg_arr_size < 48)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
> Split that if in two consecutive if-statements.

Okay.

>
> Also, why the ANDing and not simply do:
>
> 	if (ctx_info->msr_addr == MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_STATUS)
>
> ?
>
> I'm guessing you wanna match *all* MCi_STATUS MSRs - not only MC0, yes?
>
> If so, document that with in the comment above it.
>
> Thx.

ANDing with MC0 avoids bank check by turning off the bits corresponding
to the bank number.

For example: MCA_STATUS in SMCA space is 0xC0002YY1 where YY is the bank
number. The bank number is "Dont care" so ANDing with MC0_STATUS
(0xC0002001) should match on any MCi_STATUS MSR.

I will include that in comments above it.

Thanks,

>

      reply	other threads:[~2020-11-09 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-03 16:49 [PATCH v5] cper, apei, mce: Pass x86 CPER through the MCA handling chain Smita Koralahalli
2020-11-06  5:36 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-11-06 12:09   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-09  1:18     ` Punit Agrawal
2020-11-09 19:05       ` Smita Koralahalli Channabasappa
2020-11-11 20:37         ` Smita Koralahalli Channabasappa
2020-11-13  1:40           ` Punit Agrawal
2020-11-06 12:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-09 18:36   ` Smita Koralahalli Channabasappa [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ffc93b00-acc5-39ff-6df1-96daf1e5eaff@amd.com \
    --to=skoralah@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).