From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753940Ab0DNAdZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:33:25 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com ([209.85.211.194]:54261 "EHLO mail-yw0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752506Ab0DNAdX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:33:23 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WSc8p3BBYFW8ObWxEnPP37CzxNuSHIFrOocvJMWldWL8BMbUoVzflgLllyAkU8UcbX PJeMHzk5jO1Ymo6bqOOnRWptgekdj0bRwlo8rkGyW8RNSK65qd84zEp7VgF7mS0coUxc ZFsj2/oWjFxGVY6V7kJyXBq8k3XdtQjUAsQxI= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100414092209.4327e545.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <9918f566ab0259356cded31fd1dd80da6cae0c2b.1271171877.git.minchan.kim@gmail.com> <2cb77846a9523201588c5dbf94b23d6ea737ce65.1271171877.git.minchan.kim@gmail.com> <20100414092209.4327e545.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:33:22 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] change alloc function in __vmalloc_area_node From: Minchan Kim To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Bob Liu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:22 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:25:02 +0900 > Minchan Kim wrote: > >> __vmalloc_area_node never pass -1 to alloc_pages_node. >> It means node's validity check is unnecessary. >> So we can use alloc_pages_exact_node instead of alloc_pages_node. >> It could avoid comparison and branch as 6484eb3e2a81807722 tried. >> >> Cc: Nick Piggin >> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim > > Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > > But, in another thinking, > > -       if (node < 0) > -               page = alloc_page(gfp_mask); > > may be better ;) I thought it. but alloc_page is different function with alloc_pages_node in NUMA. It calls alloc_pages_current. -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim