From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837D5C433DB for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448C823127 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727106AbhAFPun (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 10:50:43 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:43026 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726826AbhAFPun (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 10:50:43 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A215D6E; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 07:49:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from e113632-lin (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B33193F719; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 07:49:56 -0800 (PST) From: Valentin Schneider To: Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bristot@redhat.com, frederic@kernel.org Subject: Re: lockdep splat in v5.11-rc1 involving console_sem and rq locks In-Reply-To: References: <20210105220115.GA27357@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20210106144621.GJ17086@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 15:49:46 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/01/21 16:44, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 06:46:21AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> What would break if I made the code dump out a few entries in the >> runqueue if the warning triggered? > > There was a patch around that did that, Valentin might remember where > that was. There is http://lore.kernel.org/r/jhjpn4bwznx.mognet@arm.com which is a dumb inline of print_rq() / print_task().