From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: Fix overlapping sched_group build
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:09:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jhjbloki9w7.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jhjeetgiamv.mognet@arm.com>
On Wed, Mar 25 2020, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24 2020, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> kernel/sched/topology.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
>> index 8344757bba6e..7033b27e5162 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
>> @@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ build_balance_mask(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_group *sg, struct cpuma
>> continue;
>>
>> /* If we would not end up here, we can't continue from here */
>> - if (!cpumask_equal(sg_span, sched_domain_span(sibling->child)))
>> + if (!cpumask_subset(sg_span, sched_domain_span(sibling->child)))
>
> So this is one source of issues; what I've done here is a bit stupid
> since we include CPUs that *cannot* end up there. What I should've done
> is something like:
>
> cpumask_and(tmp, sched_domain_span(sibling->child), sched_domain_span(sd));
> if (!cpumask_equal(sg_span, tmp))
> ...
>
> But even with that I just unfold even more horrors: this breaks the
> overlapping sched_group_capacity (see 1676330ecfa8 ("sched/topology: Fix
> overlapping sched_group_capacity")).
>
> For instance, here I would have
>
> CPU0-domain2-group4: span=4-5
> CPU4-domain2-group4: span=4-7 mask=4-5
>
^ That's using Dietmar's qemu setup; on the D06 that is
CPU0-domain2-group48: span=48-71
CPU48-domain2-group48: span=48-95 mask=48-71
> Both groups are at the same topology level and have the same first CPU,
> so they point to the same sched_group_capacity structure - but they
> don't have the same span. They would without my "fix", but then the
> group spans are back to being wrong. I'm starting to think this is
> doomed, at least in the current state of things :/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-25 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 12:55 [PATCH] sched/topology: Fix overlapping sched_group build Valentin Schneider
2020-03-24 17:20 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-03-25 11:05 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-03-25 11:22 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-03-25 17:53 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-03-25 18:09 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2020-03-25 18:38 ` Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jhjbloki9w7.mognet@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).