Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] docs: scheduler: Add scheduler overview documentation

[Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>]

On 13/05/20 14:43, john mathew wrote:
> +=========================
> +Capacity-Aware Scheduling
> +=========================
> +

Thanks for taking a jab at this. At a glance it looks okay, with one
comment below.

FWIW I still intend to write a more pamphlet-sized thing, I'll toss
something out in the coming weeks - depending on where this goes, I might
base it on this.

> +Scheduling load balancing on Asymmetric Multiprocessor systems was improved
> +through the introduction of Capacity-Aware Scheduling. It identifies the
> +most efficient CPU to assign a task based on its capacity. This capacity
> +may be asymmetric due to heterogeneous computing architecture such
> +as ARM big.LITTLE. Scheduler gets information about asymmetric capacities
> +when the scheduler domain hierarchy is built using build_sched_domains().
> +CPU capacities are provided to the scheduler topology code through the
> +architecture specific implementation of the arch_scale_cpu_capacity().
> +The SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag is set by the scheduler topology for a domain
> +in the hierarchy where all CPU capacities are visible for any cpu's point
> +of view on asymmetric CPU capacity systems. The scheduler can then take
> +capacity asymmetry into account when load balancing.
> +
> +Initial CPU capacities are derived from the Device Tree and CPU frequency.
> +For RISC-V & ARM64 it is done in drivers/base/arch_topology.c. A cpu-map
> +device tree is parsed to obtain the cpu topology and the initial CPU capacity
> +is set using the CPUFreq subsystem. A callback is registered to the CPUFreq
> +subsystem to rebuild sched_domains when CPU frequency changes.
> +

We don't rebuild domains on frequency changes (that would be ludicrous!),
rather we do that on policy changes. It's mostly because we need to wait
for cpufreq to be loaded before having a complete view over the capacities
of the CPUs (which is a mix of µarch and frequencies), i.e. we need to
rebuild the SD's again once cpufreq comes up.