From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
rkrcmar@redhat.com, guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com,
Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] KVM: x86: pass the whole hflags field to emulator and back
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 12:49:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpgmw1hirbw.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5548ECEB.3090900@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Tue, 05 May 2015 18:16:43 +0200")
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> On 05/05/2015 17:47, Bandan Das wrote:
>> > The hflags field will contain information about system management mode
>> > and will be useful for the emulator. Pass the entire field rather than
>> > just the guest-mode information.
>>
>> With respect to maintaining maximum isolation between vcpu internals and
>> the emulator,
>
> Isolation is maintained. hflags are simply parts of the processor state
> that are not visible to the guest, you can choose to include them as
> separate flags or in a single one. Bundling them in a single flag makes
> it a bit faster to pass around many of them.
>
> While we do not need all of them in the emulator, that's in some cases a
> limitation of the emulator. For example, if we wanted to emulate
> CLGI/STGI we would need either HF_GIF_MASK or another . Likewise,
> HF_NMI_MASK could replace emulator_set_nmi_mask (especially in v2 of the
> series, which will add kvm_set_hflags).
>
> However, if you prefer, I can change it to "bool smm_mode" + a new
> smm_exit emulator callback.
No, this makes sense. It's better to just pass hflags then to pass
bits individually.
> Paolo
>
>> why not just "bool smm_mode" ?
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-06 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 11:35 [RFC PATCH 00/13] KVM: x86: SMM support Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 01/13] KVM: MMU: fix for CR4.SMEP=1, CR0.WP=0? Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-08 2:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 02/13] KVM: reuse memslot in kvm_write_guest_page Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 15:03 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-05 16:29 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 03/13] KVM: export __gfn_to_pfn_memslot, drop gfn_to_pfn_async Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 04/13] KVM: remove unnecessary arg from mark_page_dirty_in_slot, export it Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 05/13] KVM: x86: pass host_initiated to functions that read MSRs Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-04 14:01 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-04 16:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 06/13] KVM: x86: pass the whole hflags field to emulator and back Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 15:47 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-05 16:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-06 16:49 ` Bandan Das [this message]
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 07/13] KVM: x86: API changes for SMM support Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-04 15:37 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-04 16:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 16:36 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-05 16:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 08/13] KVM: x86: stubs " Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-04 17:51 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-05 9:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 18:38 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-05 18:48 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 09/13] KVM: x86: save/load state on SMM switch Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-04 19:59 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-05 9:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 12:48 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-05 13:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 20:44 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-06 10:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-06 17:55 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-06 19:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-12 23:56 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-13 6:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 10/13] KVM: x86: add vcpu-specific functions to read/write/translate GFNs Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 11/13] KVM: x86: add SMM to the MMU role Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 12/13] KVM: x86: add KVM_MEM_X86_SMRAM memory slot flag Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 17:17 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-06 9:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-06 16:24 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-06 18:15 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-06 19:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-15 20:32 ` Avi Kivity
2015-05-18 8:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 13/13] KVM: x86: advertise KVM_CAP_X86_SMM Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 18:40 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] KVM: x86: SMM support Radim Krčmář
2015-05-06 11:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-06 17:14 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-19 14:25 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2015-05-19 14:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-20 1:03 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2015-05-20 15:22 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jpgmw1hirbw.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).