From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161371AbcFMSyx (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:54:53 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:43697 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161327AbcFMShb (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:37:31 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Kangjie Lu" , "David S. Miller" , "Kangjie Lu" Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:36:37 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 103/114] net: fix a kernel infoleak in x25 module In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a02:8011:400e:2:6f00:88c8:c921:d332 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.36-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Kangjie Lu commit 79e48650320e6fba48369fccf13fd045315b19b8 upstream. Stack object "dte_facilities" is allocated in x25_rx_call_request(), which is supposed to be initialized in x25_negotiate_facilities. However, 5 fields (8 bytes in total) are not initialized. This object is then copied to userland via copy_to_user, thus infoleak occurs. Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- net/x25/x25_facilities.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/net/x25/x25_facilities.c +++ b/net/x25/x25_facilities.c @@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ int x25_negotiate_facilities(struct sk_b memset(&theirs, 0, sizeof(theirs)); memcpy(new, ours, sizeof(*new)); + memset(dte, 0, sizeof(*dte)); len = x25_parse_facilities(skb, &theirs, dte, &x25->vc_facil_mask); if (len < 0)