From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org by pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org (Dovecot) with LMTP id u9gVKmBCGVtIewAAmS7hNA ; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 14:34:13 +0000 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8AB2A608D4; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 14:34:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6E8608D2; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 14:34:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org CC6E8608D2 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=decadent.org.uk Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933963AbeFGOeI (ORCPT + 25 others); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:34:08 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:40331 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933937AbeFGOeE (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:34:04 -0400 Received: from [148.252.241.226] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvbm-0005Zw-5k; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:46 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fQvb3-0002uM-Dv; Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:09:01 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Mikulas Patocka" , "Matt Turner" Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:05:21 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 147/410] alpha: fix crash if pthread_create races with signal delivery In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 148.252.241.226 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Mikulas Patocka commit 21ffceda1c8b3807615c40d440d7815e0c85d366 upstream. On alpha, a process will crash if it attempts to start a thread and a signal is delivered at the same time. The crash can be reproduced with this program: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-11/msg00473.html The reason for the crash is this: * we call the clone syscall * we go to the function copy_process * copy process calls copy_thread_tls, it is a wrapper around copy_thread * copy_thread sets the tls pointer: childti->pcb.unique = regs->r20 * copy_thread sets regs->r20 to zero * we go back to copy_process * copy process checks "if (signal_pending(current))" and returns -ERESTARTNOINTR * the clone syscall is restarted, but this time, regs->r20 is zero, so the new thread is created with zero tls pointer * the new thread crashes in start_thread when attempting to access tls The comment in the code says that setting the register r20 is some compatibility with OSF/1. But OSF/1 doesn't use the CLONE_SETTLS flag, so we don't have to zero r20 if CLONE_SETTLS is set. This patch fixes the bug by zeroing regs->r20 only if CLONE_SETTLS is not set. Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka Signed-off-by: Matt Turner Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- arch/alpha/kernel/process.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/process.c @@ -274,12 +274,13 @@ copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, u application calling fork. */ if (clone_flags & CLONE_SETTLS) childti->pcb.unique = regs->r20; + else + regs->r20 = 0; /* OSF/1 has some strange fork() semantics. */ childti->pcb.usp = usp ?: rdusp(); *childregs = *regs; childregs->r0 = 0; childregs->r19 = 0; childregs->r20 = 1; /* OSF/1 has some strange fork() semantics. */ - regs->r20 = 0; stack = ((struct switch_stack *) regs) - 1; *childstack = *stack; childstack->r26 = (unsigned long) ret_from_fork;