From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F84C7112A for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 15:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67D020645 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 15:42:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C67D020645 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=decadent.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729119AbeJNXXs (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Oct 2018 19:23:48 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:36187 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728020AbeJNXMA (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Oct 2018 19:12:00 -0400 Received: from [2a02:8011:400e:2:cbab:f00:c93f:614] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBiLo-0004cj-5f; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:30:40 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gBiLY-0000cQ-EC; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:30:24 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Jaegeuk Kim" , "Chao Yu" Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:25:41 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 286/366] f2fs: go out for insert_inode_locked failure In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a02:8011:400e:2:cbab:f00:c93f:614 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.60-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jaegeuk Kim commit a21c20f0c812925085204fced932ac95f2a76bf0 upstream. We should not call unlock_new_inode when insert_inode_locked failed. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- fs/f2fs/namei.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c @@ -52,15 +52,12 @@ static struct inode *f2fs_new_inode(stru if (err) { err = -EINVAL; nid_free = true; - goto out; + goto fail; } trace_f2fs_new_inode(inode, 0); mark_inode_dirty(inode); return inode; -out: - clear_nlink(inode); - unlock_new_inode(inode); fail: trace_f2fs_new_inode(inode, err); make_bad_inode(inode);