From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69D4C71122 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A00920645 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:02:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7A00920645 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=decadent.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728108AbeJNXns (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Oct 2018 19:43:48 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:35733 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727157AbeJNXLq (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Oct 2018 19:11:46 -0400 Received: from [2a02:8011:400e:2:cbab:f00:c93f:614] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBiLV-0004cm-Hw; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:30:21 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gBiLT-0000MZ-6a; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:30:19 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, "Thomas Gleixner" , hpa@zytor.com, len.brown@intel.com, "Dou Liyang" , "Li RongQing" Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:25:41 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 164/366] x86/acpi: Prevent X2APIC id 0xffffffff from being accounted In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a02:8011:400e:2:cbab:f00:c93f:614 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.60-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dou Liyang commit 10daf10ab154e31237a8c07242be3063fb6a9bf4 upstream. RongQing reported that there are some X2APIC id 0xffffffff in his machine's ACPI MADT table, which makes the number of possible CPU inaccurate. The reason is that the ACPI X2APIC parser has no sanity check for APIC ID 0xffffffff, which is an invalid id in all APIC types. See "IntelĀ® 64 Architecture x2APIC Specification", Chapter 2.4.1. Add a sanity check to acpi_parse_x2apic() which ignores the invalid id. Reported-by: Li RongQing Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: len.brown@intel.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180412014052.25186-1-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com [bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c @@ -227,6 +227,11 @@ acpi_parse_x2apic(struct acpi_subtable_h apic_id = processor->local_apic_id; enabled = processor->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED; + + /* Ignore invalid ID */ + if (apic_id == 0xffffffff) + return 0; + #ifdef CONFIG_X86_X2APIC /* * We need to register disabled CPU as well to permit