From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BFDC07E85 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 22:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C243D20661 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 22:10:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C243D20661 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=decadent.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728189AbeLIWKn (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:10:43 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:37590 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727524AbeLIWKm (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:10:42 -0500 Received: from pub.yeoldevic.com ([81.174.156.145] helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gW738-0002if-HB; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:43 +0000 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gW72f-0003Sa-1a; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sironi@amazon.de, "Prarit Bhargava" , "Borislav Petkov" , "Tony Luck" , "Thomas Gleixner" Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 178/328] x86/microcode: Make sure boot_cpu_data.microcode is up-to-date In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.174.156.145 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Prarit Bhargava commit 370a132bb2227ff76278f98370e0e701d86ff752 upstream. When preparing an MCE record for logging, boot_cpu_data.microcode is used to read out the microcode revision on the box. However, on systems where late microcode update has happened, the microcode revision output in a MCE log record is wrong because boot_cpu_data.microcode is not updated when the microcode gets updated. But, the microcode revision saved in boot_cpu_data's microcode member should be kept up-to-date, regardless, for consistency. Make it so. Fixes: fa94d0c6e0f3 ("x86/MCE: Save microcode revision in machine check records") Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tony Luck Cc: sironi@amazon.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180731112739.32338-1-prarit@redhat.com [bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 4 ++++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c @@ -231,6 +231,10 @@ int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) uci->cpu_sig.rev = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; c->microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; + /* Update boot_cpu_data's revision too, if we're on the BSP: */ + if (c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index) + boot_cpu_data.microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; + return 0; } --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -188,6 +188,10 @@ int apply_microcode(int cpu) uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; c->microcode = rev; + /* Update boot_cpu_data's revision too, if we're on the BSP: */ + if (c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index) + boot_cpu_data.microcode = rev; + return 0; }