From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267881AbUJSC5z (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:57:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267890AbUJSC5z (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:57:55 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:141 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267881AbUJSC5x (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:57:53 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.9... References: From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 18 Oct 2004 20:54:59 -0600 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > Ok, > despite some naming confusion (expanation: I'm a retard), I did end up > doing the 2.6.9 release today. And it wasn't the same as the "-final" test > release (see explanation above). > > Excuses aside, not a lot of changes since -rc4 (which was the last > announced test-kernel), mainly some UML updates that don't affect anybody > else. And a number of one-liners or compiler fixes. Full list appended. The ChangeLog-2.6.9 only list changes from v2.6.9-rc4 and not 2.6.8 ChangeLogs that don't cover the same set of changes their corresponding patches cover just don't seem right somehow. Eric