From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S270515AbTGSIIJ (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 19 Jul 2003 04:08:09 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270527AbTGSIIJ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 19 Jul 2003 04:08:09 -0400
Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:45939 "EHLO
	frodo.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270515AbTGSIIF
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 19 Jul 2003 04:08:05 -0400
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>,
       "Trever L. Adams" <tadams-lists@myrealbox.com>, rms@gnu.org,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bitkeeper
References: <E19dbGS-00026T-9R@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<1058558982.2479.28.camel@aurora.localdomain>
	<20030718221730.GF2289@matchmail.com>
	<1058567990.19512.103.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: 19 Jul 2003 02:20:31 -0600
In-Reply-To: <1058567990.19512.103.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <m1lluvx700.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

> On Gwe, 2003-07-18 at 23:17, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 04:09:42PM -0400, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> > > McVoy, thank you for helping Linus, Cox, Miller et al scale better.  As
> > 
> > One nit.
> > 
> > I don't think Alan is using BK.  I could be wrong though.
> 
> I'm not - and with the snapshots neither I or anyone else is forced to.

For the linux kernel.  The problem is the satellite projects which
adopt bitkeeper less carefully.  Unless there is a general gateway I
have missed.

Eric