From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755597AbYFZUb6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:31:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754311AbYFZUbc (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:31:32 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:45704 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753078AbYFZUbb (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:31:31 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Tejun Heo Cc: Benjamin Thery , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Daniel Lezcano , Serge Hallyn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Linux Containers References: <20080618170729.808539948@theryb.frec.bull.fr> <20080618170731.153832341@theryb.frec.bull.fr> <485F06B8.6090902@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:24:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: <485F06B8.6090902@gmail.com> (Tejun Heo's message of "Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:13:12 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 24.130.11.59 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Tejun Heo X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0078] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] sysfs: Implement sysfs_delete_link and sysfs_rename_link X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mgr1.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo writes: > Ugly but given the current interface limitations... Yep. I have been thinking it might be nice to look at what you did with magic symlink handling. Otherwise we either need to convert everything from sysfs_remove_link to sysfs_delete_link if we don't want to play whack a mole. Eric