archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Vignaud <>
To: Andrew Morton <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5.74] devfs lookup deadlock/stack corruption combined patch
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 12:34:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <> (Herbert Poetzl's message of "Wed, 9 Jul 2003 04:09:43 +0200")

Herbert Poetzl <> writes:

> the group using devfs, usually doesn't care about
> the 'compatibility' issue,

i disagree: distro vendors wants that compatibility.
we want both the features of devfsd+hotplug+dynamic and the
compatibility devices.

> > I'm hoping that smalldevfs comes back.  
> > The current thing is a running sore.
> I'm hoping too, and I would like to see it on 2.6 as well as 2.4 ...

there's been quite some cleanups on the 2.5.x side.
maybe can we complete this work before thinking about a new system ?
(remember the kbuild2 destiny ...)

if we do not want to create a compatibility layer such as devfsd for
smalldevfs, we can still alter drivers to create /dev/hda3 instead of
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3 and the like

withouth any compatibility, smalldevfs will be a pain in th *ss for
distro vendors.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-09 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <>
     [not found] ` <>
     [not found]   ` <>
2003-07-06 17:06     ` [PATCH][2.5.73] stack corruption in devfs_lookup Andrey Borzenkov
2003-07-06 19:03       ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]         ` <>
2003-07-07 19:06           ` [PATCH][2.5.74] devfs lookup deadlock/stack corruption combined patch Andrey Borzenkov
2003-07-07 21:00             ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-08 17:49               ` Andrey Borzenkov
2003-07-09  1:20                 ` Herbert Poetzl
2003-07-09  1:26                   ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-09  2:09                     ` Herbert Poetzl
2003-07-09 10:34                       ` Thierry Vignaud [this message]
2003-07-07 21:41             ` Pavel Roskin
2003-07-26 14:58         ` [PATCH][2.6.0-test1] redesign - stack corruption in devfs_lookup Andrey Borzenkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH][2.5.74] devfs lookup deadlock/stack corruption combined patch' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).