From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753480AbcHPNLO (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:11:14 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:35339 "EHLO mail-io0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753399AbcHPNK7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:10:59 -0400 From: Kevin Hilman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Neil Armstrong , Wim Van Sebroeck , devicetree , lkml , linux-arm-kernel , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM64: dts: amlogic: meson-gxbb: Add watchdog node Organization: BayLibre References: <1468141867-4172-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <1468141867-4172-4-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <578271D3.4080704@roeck-us.net> <7hbn237aw7.fsf@baylibre.com> <7hinv1ahqi.fsf@baylibre.com> <9cfa549e-1979-cb42-bfe1-1ef347dd3a9a@roeck-us.net> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:10:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <9cfa549e-1979-cb42-bfe1-1ef347dd3a9a@roeck-us.net> (Guenter Roeck's message of "Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:51:38 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Guenter Roeck writes: > On 08/15/2016 01:40 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Kevin Hilman writes: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>>> Hi Guenter, >>>> >>>> Kevin Hilman writes: >>>> >>>>> Guenter Roeck writes: >>>>> >>>>>> On 07/10/2016 02:11 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong >>>>>> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck >>>>>> >>>>>> Would this go in through one of the arm trees ? >>>>> >>>>> You can take the driver through the watchdog tree, but I'll take the DT >>>>> stuff through the amlogic tree (and submit via arm-soc). >>>>> >>>>> However, with your ack, and since this is a brand new driver, I could >>>>> take the driver as well. Just let me know your preference. >>>> >>>> ping... do you have a prefernce here? >>>> >>> >>> Oops, just noticed Wim already picked these up. >>> >> >> Strange, seems that Wim picked up patches 1 & 3, but this one was missed. I'll >> queue this for the arm-soc tree. >> > > I got a number of requests from arm maintainers to not pick up devicetree changes > for arch/arm, so for my part I usually leave those alone. Yeah, that's the normal way, but Wim replied to the cover letter saying he would pick up all three, so I got a bit confused. Anyways, not a big deal. I'll take it from here. Kevin