From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:30:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:30:08 -0500 Received: from wireless90.cs.wisc.edu ([128.105.48.190]:51099 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:29:59 -0500 To: OGAWA Hirofumi Cc: Mike Coleman , marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace on stopped processes (2.4) In-Reply-To: <87g0632lzw.fsf@mathdogs.com> <878zawvl1v.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <87r8ogr9za.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> From: vic Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:29:52 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87r8ogr9za.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> (OGAWA Hirofumi's message of "Thu, 24 Jan 2002 07:14:17 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT, and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP can't send a signal > by the same reason. Please read the do_signal(). I've read that function, but I don't see why it would not get along with my suggestion to send SIGKILL rather than set exit_code to implement PTRACE_KILL. No doubt I can be rather thick; in this case, induction doesn't help me.