linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug McNaught <doug@wireboard.com>
To: Matt Nelson <mnelson@dynatec.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any limitations on bigmem usage?
Date: 11 Jun 2001 20:31:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m37kyitu78.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B255FC1.90501@dynatec.com>
In-Reply-To: Matt Nelson's message of "Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:18:09 -0700"

Matt Nelson <mnelson@dynatec.com> writes:

> I am about to embark on a data processing software project that will require a
> LOT of memory (about, ohhh, 6GB or so), and I was wondering if there are any
> limitations to how one can use very large chunks of memory under
> Linux. Specifically, is there anything to prevent me from malloc()ing 6GB of
> memory, then accessing that memory as I would any other buffer?  FYI, the
> application
> 
> will be buffering a stream of data, then performing a variety of calculations
> on large blocks of data at a time, before writing it out to a socket.

Pointers on IA32 are still 32 bits, so (as I understand it) each
process can address a maximum of 4GB.  You would have to allocate
multiple chunks (in shared memory or mmap()ed files, so they're
persistent) and map them in and out as needed (which could get hairy).

> I've been eyeing an 8-way Intel box with gobs of memory, but if there are
> subtle issues with using that much memory, I need to know now.

Best bet is probably to buy an Alpha machine, if you don't want to
spend time working around the 4GB limitation.

-Doug
-- 
The rain man gave me two cures; he said jump right in,
The first was Texas medicine--the second was just railroad gin,
And like a fool I mixed them, and it strangled up my mind,
Now people just get uglier, and I got no sense of time...          --Dylan

  reply	other threads:[~2001-06-12  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-12  0:18 Matt Nelson
2001-06-12  0:31 ` Doug McNaught [this message]
2001-06-12  0:38   ` Doug McNaught
2001-06-12 14:03 ` Matt Nelson
2001-06-12 16:29 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-12 12:46   ` Rob Landley
2001-06-12 18:16     ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-12 18:34 Holzrichter, Bruce
2001-06-13 10:39 ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m37kyitu78.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org \
    --to=doug@wireboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mnelson@dynatec.com \
    --subject='Re: Any limitations on bigmem usage?' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).