From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264078AbTDWPE7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:04:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264080AbTDWPE7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:04:59 -0400 Received: from tmi.comex.ru ([217.10.33.92]:25567 "EHLO gw.home.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264078AbTDWPE6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:04:58 -0400 X-Comment-To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.5.68-mm2 From: Alex Tomas To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Organization: HOME Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 19:14:32 +0400 In-Reply-To: <18400000.1051109459@[10.10.2.4]> (Martin J. Bligh's message of "Wed, 23 Apr 2003 07:51:00 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) References: <20030423012046.0535e4fd.akpm@digeo.com> <18400000.1051109459@[10.10.2.4]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> Martin J Bligh (MJB) writes: >> . I got tired of the objrmap code going BUG under stress, so it is now in >> disgrace in the experimental/ directory. MJB> Any chance of some more info on that? BUG at what point in the code, MJB> and with what test to reproduce? I've seen this running fsx-linux on ext3