LKML Archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Palmer Dabbelt <>
To: Christoph Hellwig <>
Cc:, Andrew Waterman <>,
	Arnd Bergmann <>,,,
	Christoph Hellwig <>,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] RISC-V: Define sys_riscv_flush_icache when SMP=n
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <mhng-341b5b76-2cd6-41e3-859a-6b1d926ba770@palmer-si-x1c4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 01:38:04 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 03:19:51PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> This would be necessary to make non-SMP builds work, but there is
>> another error in the implementation of our syscall linkage that actually
>> just causes sys_riscv_flush_icache to never build.  I've build tested
>> this on allnoconfig and allnoconfig+SMP=y, as well as defconfig like
>> normal.
> Would't it make sense to use COND_SYSCALL to stub out the syscall
> for !SMP builds?

I'm not sure.  We can implement the syscall fine in !SMP, it's just that the 
vDSO is expected to always eat these calls because in non-SMP mode you can do a 
global fence.i by just doing a local fence.i (there's only one hart).

The original rationale behind not having the syscall in non-SMP mode was to 
limit the user ABI, but on looking again that seems like it's just a bit of 
extra complexity that doesn't help anything.  It's already been demonstrated 
that nothing is checking the error because it's been silently slipping past 
userspace for six months, so the extra complexity seems like it'll just cause 
someone else to have to chase the bug in the future.

But I'm really OK either way.  Is there a precedent for what to do here?

  reply index

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-09 22:19 RISC-V: Don't use a global include guard for uapi/asm/syscalls Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-09 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] RISC-V: Define sys_riscv_flush_icache when SMP=n Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-10  8:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-10 18:27     ` Palmer Dabbelt [this message]
2018-08-10 18:47       ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-10 20:55         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-14 13:35       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-10 14:07   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-14 13:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-20 23:30     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-09 22:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] RISC-V: Don't use a global include guard for uapi/asm/syscalls.h Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-10 14:07   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-14 13:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-20 23:30     ` Palmer Dabbelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mhng-341b5b76-2cd6-41e3-859a-6b1d926ba770@palmer-si-x1c4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LKML Archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/6.git
	git clone --mirror lkml/git/7.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ \
	public-inbox-index lkml

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone public-inbox