From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834CFC433F5 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 00:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634E561159 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 00:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230149AbhJEAmt (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2021 20:42:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51160 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230459AbhJEAmg (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2021 20:42:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-x92e.google.com (mail-ua1-x92e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2700AC0613EC for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-x92e.google.com with SMTP id c33so13668470uae.9 for ; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:40:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dabbelt-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eu6xQaZ+L/7SEbm2kM+MqievePKlsmmZKrxh7/j0Gx0=; b=bYFTdC458YYvLwQWaj0LutyFeNvzV2xOB8z/FiTrRLph+G40abtUQCO7uUSITFUICI Q6cb7RZQtPqpGs1yeUuyknrm9ehOepAPItJA8O2rB7N9n70BN4qJD5/t5kPv0rOI0Olo z+WrLDXkCwM0aBqbChhu8CfCefkTcdgpyO95qPPdXZo2FLQ11C484aoaDvJM5o9Mky2r 0a3Fx1sjtyjW9RyIr49QLvfFzsBMDZpA/g9eacX+dNIQGaE4K57YpCuR6FAcdRC9ab7f ahCVe92QuHDG7m5m1873+sqz6WK3jJ+wF4u0SVZ5H6bnIJz83eua1IRqSJyST4qk98SY IODA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eu6xQaZ+L/7SEbm2kM+MqievePKlsmmZKrxh7/j0Gx0=; b=Yj+1to4PO0mscHWnXswzmn7vZ2UpOxcWXpeFGY7PHJ41gIpjAKzy+Y95zjglttyCPp Y1owP6eNex6gzS0PGykxytXY+pQOXH7rmttLBtOahrMpXx9e7RdXTBXS/IdTXGSi2xDI 59BpCzcopxvSaKQA8YcsXNyI3Gbt6Sm8cQMNJ7AKcDh2GBu1xdBRVseXo6QKrfzIxS80 +U+HOp6lKIH6OFjjgOFpskozKbZLIeBUuxnnDpVBpdiWnpCJaWvwTGPH5b8mcf4t0JMs IO1AAAbjBNVJR8UAaABtOny7TbWdGgSnJitf/6yfw59pcc29Jfq8jxSuYsatzUDHfVyY SXmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YQTj2LT1SyVNQXWGLV2KKqW1J/vaYk+hmA8jXMNfu7Yaj5nP2 BxbD88pJcEA/uyn17S6MeOp9mg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJww3mVtU7cqIbTqZq2nACjciZnsKEYgEPbhUhT9+QN5X45mMFKcavhdWpRrezYolgErPY2PnA== X-Received: by 2002:ab0:494a:: with SMTP id a10mr10097245uad.90.1633394443206; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (76-210-143-223.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.210.143.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g20sm8030772vkf.33.2021.10.04.17.40.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:40:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:40:37 PDT (-0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] riscv: remove Kconfig check for GCC version for ARCH_RV64I In-Reply-To: <202109130923.E294BFD5C@keescook> CC: ndesaulniers@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, nathan@kernel.org, masahiroy@kernel.org, joe@perches.com, arnd@kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley , aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org From: Palmer Dabbelt To: ndesaulniers@google.com, keescook@chromium.org Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:23:45 PDT (-0700), keescook@chromium.org wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:40:42PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >> The minimum supported version of GCC is now 5.1. The check wasn't >> correct as written anyways since GCC_VERSION is 0 when CC=clang. >> >> Cc: Paul Walmsley >> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt >> Cc: Albert Ou >> Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org >> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers > > Yeah, good catch for Clang too. > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt Only this patch ended up in my inbox. Where you guys planning on keeping this whole series together, or did you want me to pick this for the RISC-V tree?