From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
To: linux@roeck-us.net
Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Drop setup_initrd
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 17:09:04 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mhng-fadb4889-1082-4cef-a4a6-8faf828c4528@palmer-si-x1c4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180828221238.GA6605@roeck-us.net>
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:12:38 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:03:00PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:59:59 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
>> >On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:46:09PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> >>On Aug 28 2018, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 01:10:20PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> >>>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 21:11:40 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
>> >>>> >setup_initrd() does not appear to serve a practical purpose other than
>> >>>> >preventing qemu boots with "-initrd" parameter, so let's drop it.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> >>>> >---
>> >>>> > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 39 ---------------------------------------
>> >>>> > 1 file changed, 39 deletions(-)
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>> >>>> >index 2e56af3281f8..579f58a42974 100644
>> >>>> >--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>> >>>> >+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>> >>>> >@@ -82,41 +82,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(empty_zero_page);
>> >>>> > /* The lucky hart to first increment this variable will boot the other cores */
>> >>>> > atomic_t hart_lottery;
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >-#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
>> >>>> >-static void __init setup_initrd(void)
>> >>>> >-{
>> >>>> >- extern char __initramfs_start[];
>> >>>> >- extern unsigned long __initramfs_size;
>> >>>> >- unsigned long size;
>> >>>> >-
>> >>>> >- if (__initramfs_size > 0) {
>> >>>> >- initrd_start = (unsigned long)(&__initramfs_start);
>> >>>> >- initrd_end = initrd_start + __initramfs_size;
>> >>>> >- }
>> >>>
>> >>> The underlying problem is probably that __initramfs_size == 512 even
>> >>> if there is no embedded initrd. Result is that initrd_start and initrd_end
>> >>> are always overwritten, even if provided and even if there is no embedded
>> >>> initrd. Result is that initrd_start and initrd_end are always overwritten,
>> >>> and -initrd from the qemu command line is always ignored.
>> >>>
>> >>> A less invasive fix than mine would be
>> >>>
>> >>> - if (__initramfs_size > 0) {
>> >>> + if (__initramfs_size > 0 && !initrd_start) {
>> >>>
>> >>> Any chance you can test that with your setup ?
>> >>
>> >>You should just delete the last four lines above. They serve no purpose.
>> >>
>> >
>> >You mean the entire if() statement plus the variable declarations ?
>> >
>> >That works for me, for both embedded initrd and initrd specified with
>> >-initrd option, but we still need someone to test if it works for
>> >Palmer's use case, ie with vmlinux (and possibly initrd) embedded in
>> >bbl.
>>
>> This still boots my Fedora images
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>> index db20dc630e7e..aee603123030 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -85,15 +85,8 @@ atomic_t hart_lottery;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
>> static void __init setup_initrd(void)
>> {
>> - extern char __initramfs_start[];
>> - extern unsigned long __initramfs_size;
>> unsigned long size;
>> - if (__initramfs_size > 0) {
>> - initrd_start = (unsigned long)(&__initramfs_start);
>> - initrd_end = initrd_start + __initramfs_size;
>> - }
>> -
>> if (initrd_start >= initrd_end) {
>> printk(KERN_INFO "initrd not found or empty");
>> goto disable;
>>
>> but I have not tried an integrated initramfs.
>
> I tested the above both with external initrd and with integrated
> initramfs; both work for me.
>
> Should I resend my patch, using the above, or do you want to create
> a patch yourself ?
You should send one, then it'll go through my regular pre-PR testing flow to
make sure it works on my end. I just never trust these inline patches to be
exact, even if it's unlikely there's any confusion on a patch this simple (at
least, mechanically simple -- I'm afraid I still don't understand why the logic
is incorrect).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-10 4:11 [PATCH] riscv: Drop setup_initrd Guenter Roeck
2018-08-10 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-20 22:33 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-28 20:10 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-28 20:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-28 21:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-28 21:46 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-08-28 21:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-28 22:03 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-28 22:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-29 0:09 ` Palmer Dabbelt [this message]
2018-08-29 0:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-29 0:49 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mhng-fadb4889-1082-4cef-a4a6-8faf828c4528@palmer-si-x1c4 \
--to=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).