linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
To: "Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/2] x86/speculation: apply IBPB more strictly to avoid cross-process data leak
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 21:36:12 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1809102132480.15880@cbobk.fhfr.pm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99FC4B6EFCEFD44486C35F4C281DC6732144AEC9@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Schaufler, Casey wrote:

> Yes, It would require that this patch be tested against all the existing 
> security modules that provide a ptrace_access_check hook. It's not like 
> the security module writers don't have a bunch of locking issues to deal 
> with.

Yeah, that was indeed my concern.

So can we agree on doing this in the 2nd envisioned step, when this is 
going to be replaced by LSM as discussed [1] previously?

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/99FC4B6EFCEFD44486C35F4C281DC67321447094@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-10 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-10  9:22 [PATCH v5 0/2] Harden spectrev2 userspace-userspace protection Jiri Kosina
2018-09-10  9:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] x86/speculation: apply IBPB more strictly to avoid cross-process data leak Jiri Kosina
2018-09-10 18:26   ` Schaufler, Casey
2018-09-10 19:14     ` Jiri Kosina
2018-09-10 19:26       ` Schaufler, Casey
2018-09-10 19:36         ` Jiri Kosina [this message]
2018-09-10 20:27           ` Schaufler, Casey
2018-09-10 20:42             ` Jiri Kosina
2018-09-10 21:29               ` Schaufler, Casey
2018-09-10 21:36                 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-09-11 21:15                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-11 22:25                   ` Schaufler, Casey
2018-09-12 12:01                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-21 19:38   ` Pavel Machek
2018-10-21 23:32     ` Jiri Kosina
2018-09-10  9:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/speculation: Enable cross-hyperthread spectre v2 STIBP mitigation Jiri Kosina
2018-09-10 10:04   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-10 11:01     ` Jiri Kosina
2018-09-10 11:46       ` Jiri Kosina
2018-09-11 17:32         ` Tim Chen
2018-09-11 21:16           ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-11 21:46             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-12 17:16             ` Tom Lendacky
2018-09-12 21:26               ` Tim Chen
2018-09-12 21:45                 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-09-12 22:56                   ` Tim Chen
2018-09-13 14:53                 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-09-12  9:05 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Harden spectrev2 userspace-userspace protection Jiri Kosina
2018-09-12  9:06   ` [PATCH v6 1/3] x86/speculation: apply IBPB more strictly to avoid cross-process data leak Jiri Kosina
2018-09-13  0:04     ` Schaufler, Casey
2018-09-14 11:00       ` Jiri Kosina
2018-09-14 11:05         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-12  9:07   ` [PATCH v6 2/3] x86/speculation: Enable cross-hyperthread spectre v2 STIBP mitigation Jiri Kosina
2018-09-12 19:14     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-12 19:16       ` Jiri Kosina
2018-09-12  9:08   ` [PATCH v6 3/3] x86/speculation: Propagate information about RSB filling mitigation to sysfs Jiri Kosina
2018-09-17 16:09   ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Harden spectrev2 userspace-userspace protection Schaufler, Casey
2018-09-19 15:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-22  7:38       ` Jiri Kosina
2018-09-22  9:53         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-22 10:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-22 10:20             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-22 13:30               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-22 14:31                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-24  8:43                 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-09-24 12:38                   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=nycvar.YFH.7.76.1809102132480.15880@cbobk.fhfr.pm \
    --to=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).