From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48932C282C4 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F1C217FA for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:09:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549976952; bh=fNGrO4Z9cUqKFFi3SgEvqFc8Qs3lIpeumSpYFWUZoIY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=bkCrc6pO58IXFgjUdShXnHfKpTXEgmrr/G4ZTdzcolkoKjAXm/OoXmG0my/iTTfCP ciUGn+ifpv5EWoLP1Gn28adanH+mXuVRIIA1NxrY+n2Ya5C6+cO5vI//82+3WpAPnQ VuOwAq7GJQ/iIyeCo1rLRzxyldq2ooKG8pk6uOgo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729702AbfBLNJK (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:09:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49490 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728827AbfBLNJJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:09:09 -0500 Received: from pobox.suse.cz (prg-ext-pat.suse.com [213.151.95.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DFB6214DA; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:09:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549976948; bh=fNGrO4Z9cUqKFFi3SgEvqFc8Qs3lIpeumSpYFWUZoIY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hUf05cJMYzkJpBgq5qfmfo09arTbQIEkVyuFLVQ8M0QgIbGCHBr6TokNUO4hoXelk +p5q/ABQDWYsymzOLraWRV19VheHRzEYxIXfcO3RbAKyYIqol3EzEbT/Ja7jtb6zKU FdBPL/RflncvjMXlCLW9EvaMtiGzhayA7RIVCcnQ= Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:09:03 +0100 (CET) From: Jiri Kosina To: Michal Hocko cc: Vlastimil Babka , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Greg KH , Jann Horn , Dominique Martinet , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Chinner , Kevin Easton , Matthew Wilcox , Cyril Hrubis , Tejun Heo , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Daniel Gruss , Josh Snyder Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mincore: provide mapped status when cached status is not allowed In-Reply-To: <20190212063643.GL15609@dhcp22.suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <20190130124420.1834-1-vbabka@suse.cz> <20190130124420.1834-4-vbabka@suse.cz> <20190131100907.GS18811@dhcp22.suse.cz> <99ee4d3e-aeb2-0104-22be-b028938e7f88@suse.cz> <20190212063643.GL15609@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Michal Hocko wrote: > I would go with patch 1 for 5.1. Patches 2 still sounds controversial or > incomplete to me. Is it because of the disagreement what 'non-blocking' really means, or do you see something else missing? Merging patch just patch 1 withouth patch 2 is probably sort of useless excercise, unfortunately. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs