linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH][next] SFH: fix error return check for -ERESTARTSYS
@ 2020-10-30 14:30 Colin King
  2020-10-30 14:40 ` AW: " Walter Harms
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2020-10-30 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nehal Shah, Sandeep Singh, Jiri Kosina, Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input
  Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Currently the check for the error return code -ERESTARTSYS is dead code
and never executed because a previous check for ret < 0 is catching this
and returning -ETIMEDOUT instead.  Fix this by checking for -ERESTARTSYS
before the more generic negative error code.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
Fixes: 4b2c53d93a4b ("SFH:Transport Driver to add support of AMD Sensor Fusion Hub (SFH)")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
index a471079a3bd0..4f989483aa03 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
@@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ static int amdtp_wait_for_response(struct hid_device *hid)
 		ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(hid_data->hid_wait,
 						       cli_data->request_done[i],
 						       msecs_to_jiffies(AMD_SFH_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT));
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return -ETIMEDOUT;
-	else if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
+	if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
 		return -ERESTARTSYS;
+	else if (ret < 0)
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 	else
 		return 0;
 }
-- 
2.27.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* AW: [PATCH][next] SFH: fix error return check for -ERESTARTSYS
  2020-10-30 14:30 [PATCH][next] SFH: fix error return check for -ERESTARTSYS Colin King
@ 2020-10-30 14:40 ` Walter Harms
  2020-11-09 17:08 ` Singh, Sandeep
  2020-11-12 15:27 ` Jiri Kosina
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Walter Harms @ 2020-10-30 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Colin King, Nehal Shah, Sandeep Singh, Jiri Kosina,
	Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input
  Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel

nit picking:
i would  without "else" to improve readability:

       if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
                 return -ERESTARTSYS;

        if (ret < 0)
              return -ETIMEDOUT;

          return 0;

jm2c
 wh
________________________________________
Von: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Oktober 2020 15:30:02
An: Nehal Shah; Sandeep Singh; Jiri Kosina; Benjamin Tissoires; linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: [PATCH][next] SFH: fix error return check for -ERESTARTSYS

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Currently the check for the error return code -ERESTARTSYS is dead code
and never executed because a previous check for ret < 0 is catching this
and returning -ETIMEDOUT instead.  Fix this by checking for -ERESTARTSYS
before the more generic negative error code.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
Fixes: 4b2c53d93a4b ("SFH:Transport Driver to add support of AMD Sensor Fusion Hub (SFH)")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
index a471079a3bd0..4f989483aa03 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
@@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ static int amdtp_wait_for_response(struct hid_device *hid)
                ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(hid_data->hid_wait,
                                                       cli_data->request_done[i],
                                                       msecs_to_jiffies(AMD_SFH_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT));
-       if (ret < 0)
-               return -ETIMEDOUT;
-       else if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
+       if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
                return -ERESTARTSYS;
+       else if (ret < 0)
+               return -ETIMEDOUT;
        else
                return 0;
 }
--
2.27.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][next] SFH: fix error return check for -ERESTARTSYS
  2020-10-30 14:30 [PATCH][next] SFH: fix error return check for -ERESTARTSYS Colin King
  2020-10-30 14:40 ` AW: " Walter Harms
@ 2020-11-09 17:08 ` Singh, Sandeep
  2020-11-12 15:27 ` Jiri Kosina
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Singh, Sandeep @ 2020-11-09 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Colin King, Nehal Shah, Sandeep Singh, Jiri Kosina,
	Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input
  Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel


On 10/30/2020 8:00 PM, Colin King wrote:
> [CAUTION: External Email]
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Currently the check for the error return code -ERESTARTSYS is dead code
> and never executed because a previous check for ret < 0 is catching this
> and returning -ETIMEDOUT instead.  Fix this by checking for -ERESTARTSYS
> before the more generic negative error code.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
> Fixes: 4b2c53d93a4b ("SFH:Transport Driver to add support of AMD Sensor Fusion Hub (SFH)")

Thank you for the patch ..looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Sandeep Singh <sandeep.singh@amd.com>

> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>   drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
> index a471079a3bd0..4f989483aa03 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
> @@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ static int amdtp_wait_for_response(struct hid_device *hid)
>                  ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(hid_data->hid_wait,
>                                                         cli_data->request_done[i],
>                                                         msecs_to_jiffies(AMD_SFH_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT));
> -       if (ret < 0)
> -               return -ETIMEDOUT;
> -       else if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
> +       if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
>                  return -ERESTARTSYS;
> +       else if (ret < 0)
> +               return -ETIMEDOUT;
>          else
>                  return 0;
>   }
> --
> 2.27.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][next] SFH: fix error return check for -ERESTARTSYS
  2020-10-30 14:30 [PATCH][next] SFH: fix error return check for -ERESTARTSYS Colin King
  2020-10-30 14:40 ` AW: " Walter Harms
  2020-11-09 17:08 ` Singh, Sandeep
@ 2020-11-12 15:27 ` Jiri Kosina
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2020-11-12 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Colin King
  Cc: Nehal Shah, Sandeep Singh, Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input,
	kernel-janitors, linux-kernel

On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, Colin King wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Currently the check for the error return code -ERESTARTSYS is dead code
> and never executed because a previous check for ret < 0 is catching this
> and returning -ETIMEDOUT instead.  Fix this by checking for -ERESTARTSYS
> before the more generic negative error code.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
> Fixes: 4b2c53d93a4b ("SFH:Transport Driver to add support of AMD Sensor Fusion Hub (SFH)")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-12 15:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-30 14:30 [PATCH][next] SFH: fix error return check for -ERESTARTSYS Colin King
2020-10-30 14:40 ` AW: " Walter Harms
2020-11-09 17:08 ` Singh, Sandeep
2020-11-12 15:27 ` Jiri Kosina

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).