Re: [Regression] Bug 216395 - XP-Pen Star G430S stops working on any kernel newer than 5.18.7

From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: "Benjamin Tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	gomapo2868@safe-cart.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	"regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
	"Roman Romanenko" <romu4444@gmail.com>,
	"Nikolai Kondrashov" <spbnick@gmail.com>,
	"José Expósito" <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Regression] Bug 216395 - XP-Pen Star G430S stops working on any kernel newer than 5.18.7
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:05:44 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2208261304470.19850@cbobk.fhfr.pm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3ab81d9-0fe1-0bc9-b265-37793c11ff77@leemhuis.info>

On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.
> 
> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org that afaics nobody
> acted upon since it was reported. That's why I decided to forward it by
> mail to those that afaics should handle this.
> 
> To quote from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216395 :
> 
> >  gomapo2868@safe-cart.com 2022-08-22 16:28:00 UTC
> > 
> > XP-Pen Star G430S stops working on newer kernels than 5.18.7 (5.18.8, 5.19, 6.0rc1 tested)
> > It seems to use the uclogic drivers.
> 
> See the ticket for details and further comments.

Thorsten, thanks for the report.

CCing people who have been working on XP-Pen support recently (Roman, 
Nikolai, José).

Keeping the rest of the mail below for reference.

> 
> Please look into the issue if you're among the main recipients of this
> mail (and not just CCed). I hope I picked the right people to sent this
> to, if not just let everyone know (and apologies for getting it wrong!).
> 
> Anyway, to ensure this is not forgotten lets get this tracked by the the
> Linux kernel regression tracking bot:
> 
> #regzbot introduced: v5.18..5.18.7
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216395
> #regzbot ignore-activity
> 
> This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
> discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
> the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
> something else totally wrong? Then just reply -- ideally with also
> telling regzbot about it, as explained here:
> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/tracked-regression/
> 
> Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags
> pointing to the report in bugzilla, as the kernel's documentation calls
> for; above page explains why this is important for tracked regressions.
> 
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> 
> P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
> reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
> this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
> reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.
> 

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs