From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:57:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:57:37 -0500 Received: from mail.coastside.net ([207.213.212.6]:50134 "EHLO mail.coastside.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:57:36 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20030306061254.GA24178@citd.de> References: <20030303123029.GC20929@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20030305205032.GD2958@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20030306061254.GA24178@citd.de> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:07:06 -0800 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List From: Jonathan Lundell Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows temperature anomaly Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 7:12am +0100 3/6/03, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: >Hmmm. Wasn't there something with IDE and the LE-Chipset. > >Maybe you should try a current kernel. Don't know if this old-kernel has >the fix. It involved DMA, I think; I've disabled IDE DMA altogether. My current plan is to run the tests with a more recent kernel, and to compare PIII MSRs between a Linux and Windows boot. -- /Jonathan Lundell.