From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423017AbWAMWUp (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:20:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423020AbWAMWUo (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:20:44 -0500 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:38807 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423017AbWAMWUn (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:20:43 -0500 To: Andrew Morton Cc: drepper@gmail.com, robustmutexes@lists.osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daviado@gmail.com Subject: Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15 References: <20060113132704.207336d7.akpm@osdl.org> From: Andi Kleen Date: 13 Jan 2006 23:20:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060113132704.207336d7.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton writes: > > +static int futex_deadlock(struct rt_mutex *lock) > +{ > + DEFINE_WAIT(wait); > + > + _raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); > + _raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock); And why is there a pi_lock if the code isn't supposed to support PI? -Andi