From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932403AbWF3Kju (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:39:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932435AbWF3Kju (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:39:50 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:9150 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932403AbWF3Kju (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:39:50 -0400 To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Proposal and plan for ext2/3 future development work References: From: Andi Kleen Date: 30 Jun 2006 12:39:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Theodore Ts'o" writes: > > 1) The creation of a new filesystem codebase in the 2.6 kernel tree in > /usr/src/linux/fs/ext4 that will initially register itself as the > "ext3dev" Why not call it ext4 from the beginning too? Calling the directory differently from the file system can only cause confusion. I assume if it's marked very experimental people who value their data will avoid it for the time being. -Andi