linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 23:20:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2005.09.19.21.19.59.501960@smurf.noris.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.58.0509181513440.9106@g5.osdl.org

Hi, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Well, to be slightly more positive: it's not a very easy feature to do
> properly.

It's apparently an easy feature to do decidedly suboptimally.

This sample code

#include <malloc.h>
struct foo {
    char fill1[1000];
    int bar;
    char fill2[1000];
    int baz;
    char fill3[1000];
};
struct foo *get_foo() {
    struct foo *res = malloc(sizeof(struct foo));
    *res = (struct foo){.bar=5, .baz=7};
    return res;
}

calls memcpy _twice_ -- it initializes the object on the stack from a
couple of mostly-zero bytes in .rodata, and then memcpy's the thing to the
heap.
 
> So considering that almost nobody does this (certainly not SpecInt), and
> it would probably require re-organizations at many levels, I'm not
> surprised it hasn't gotten a lot of attention.
> 
This is gcc 4.0. Optimization levels (I tried 0, 3, and s) don't affect
this -- which surprised me; I'd have thought that gcc would decide on
the proper trade-off between programmed and static initialization a bit
later.

-- 
Matthias Urlichs   |   {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de   |  smurf@smurf.noris.de
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
 - -
O that my tongue were in the thunder's mouth! Then with a passion would I
shake the world.
					-- Shakespeare



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-19 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-18 10:06 p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), ) Russell King
2005-09-18 11:04 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-18 14:39   ` Al Viro
2005-09-18 16:25     ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-09-18 17:30       ` Al Viro
2005-09-18 18:00         ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-18 17:47       ` Alan Cox
2005-09-18 16:32 ` Robert Love
2005-09-18 16:52   ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-18 17:18     ` Al Viro
2005-09-18 17:31       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-18 17:45         ` Al Viro
2005-09-18 20:34           ` Roman Zippel
2005-09-18 21:12             ` Al Viro
2005-09-18 21:52               ` Al Viro
2005-09-18 22:25                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-18 23:07                   ` Al Viro
2005-09-20  6:31                     ` Richard Henderson
2005-09-19 21:20                   ` Matthias Urlichs [this message]
2005-09-19 21:28                     ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-09-18 19:07         ` Al Viro
2005-09-18 21:30           ` Alan Cox
2005-09-18 21:14             ` Al Viro
2005-09-19  6:09             ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-09-21  2:18         ` Miles Bader
2005-09-18 17:32   ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-19  6:47   ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-09-20  8:53   ` Pekka Enberg
2005-09-20  9:39     ` Al Viro
2005-09-20  9:47       ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-09-20  9:53         ` Al Viro
2005-09-20 10:07           ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-09-20 15:14         ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-20 11:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-09-20 11:40   ` Russell King
2005-09-20 11:56     ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-09-20 12:20     ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-09-20 12:31       ` Russell King
2005-09-20 12:35         ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-09-20 15:21           ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-20 12:53         ` Pekka J Enberg
2005-09-20 17:11         ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-20 17:17           ` Russell King
2005-09-20 18:02           ` Alan Cox
2005-09-20 17:59             ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-20 18:11               ` Russell King
2005-09-20 18:41                 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-20 20:41               ` Alan Cox
2005-09-20 19:41             ` Horst von Brand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pan.2005.09.19.21.19.59.501960@smurf.noris.de \
    --to=smurf@smurf.noris.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).