From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:57:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:57:31 -0400 Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]:5817 "EHLO mons.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:57:17 -0400 To: "Tom Sightler" Cc: "Linux-Kernel" Subject: Re: NFS Client and SMP In-Reply-To: <001d01c13004$61965890$70751a0a@zeusinc.com> From: Trond Myklebust Date: 29 Aug 2001 10:57:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: "Tom Sightler"'s message of "Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:59:48 -0400" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Tom Sightler writes: > Is this problem specific to the 2.4 series or is the 2.2 NFS > implementation suspect to this as well. I am curious because > we have a good number of SMP servers running SuSE's 2.2.19 > kernel connected to a NetApp filer via GigE with jumbo frames > and have not had any problems during development. However, we > are about 1 month from going production and load will increase > tremendously then (even though we've attempted to stress the > system in development, real production always introduces new > loads). I don't have acces to a test setup for Gigabit, so I have to rely on other people's reports. I can only remember hearing of problems in 2.4.x, however you might want to check the archives on the NFS discussion list on Sourceforge. Cheers, Trond