From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262913AbTKZPBR (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:01:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263119AbTKZPBR (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:01:17 -0500 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:54674 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262913AbTKZPBQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:01:16 -0500 To: Andi Kleen Cc: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fire Engine?? References: <20031125183035.1c17185a.davem@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> From: Trond Myklebust Date: 26 Nov 2003 10:00:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact postmaster@uio.no if you have questions about this scanning X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Andi Kleen writes: > - If they tested TCP-over-NFS then I'm pretty sure Linux lost ^^^^^^^^^^^^ That would be inefficient 8-) > badly because the current paths for that are just awfully > inefficient. ...mind elaborating? Cheers, Trond