linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Waiman Long <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, jstancek@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	changbin.du@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	longman@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: [tip:core/debugobjects] debugobjects: Scale thresholds with # of CPUs
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 08:23:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-97dd552eb23c83dbf626a6e84666c7e281375d47@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483647425-4135-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>

Commit-ID:  97dd552eb23c83dbf626a6e84666c7e281375d47
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/97dd552eb23c83dbf626a6e84666c7e281375d47
Author:     Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:17:04 -0500
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 09:01:55 +0100

debugobjects: Scale thresholds with # of CPUs

On a large SMP systems with hundreds of CPUs, the current thresholds
for allocating and freeing debug objects (256 and 1024 respectively)
may not work well. This can cause a lot of needless calls to
kmem_aloc() and kmem_free() on those systems.

To alleviate this thrashing problem, the object freeing threshold
is now increased to "1024 + # of CPUs * 32". Whereas the object
allocation threshold is increased to "256 + # of CPUs * 4". That
should make the debug objects subsystem scale better with the number
of CPUs available in the system.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: "Du Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1483647425-4135-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

---
 lib/debugobjects.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
index d78673e..dc78217 100644
--- a/lib/debugobjects.c
+++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
@@ -52,7 +52,10 @@ static int			debug_objects_fixups __read_mostly;
 static int			debug_objects_warnings __read_mostly;
 static int			debug_objects_enabled __read_mostly
 				= CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_ENABLE_DEFAULT;
-
+static int			debug_objects_pool_size __read_mostly
+				= ODEBUG_POOL_SIZE;
+static int			debug_objects_pool_min_level __read_mostly
+				= ODEBUG_POOL_MIN_LEVEL;
 static struct debug_obj_descr	*descr_test  __read_mostly;
 
 /*
@@ -94,13 +97,13 @@ static void fill_pool(void)
 	struct debug_obj *new;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if (likely(obj_pool_free >= ODEBUG_POOL_MIN_LEVEL))
+	if (likely(obj_pool_free >= debug_objects_pool_min_level))
 		return;
 
 	if (unlikely(!obj_cache))
 		return;
 
-	while (obj_pool_free < ODEBUG_POOL_MIN_LEVEL) {
+	while (obj_pool_free < debug_objects_pool_min_level) {
 
 		new = kmem_cache_zalloc(obj_cache, gfp);
 		if (!new)
@@ -176,7 +179,7 @@ static void free_obj_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pool_lock, flags);
-	while (obj_pool_free > ODEBUG_POOL_SIZE) {
+	while (obj_pool_free > debug_objects_pool_size) {
 		obj = hlist_entry(obj_pool.first, typeof(*obj), node);
 		hlist_del(&obj->node);
 		obj_pool_free--;
@@ -206,7 +209,7 @@ static void free_object(struct debug_obj *obj)
 	 * schedule work when the pool is filled and the cache is
 	 * initialized:
 	 */
-	if (obj_pool_free > ODEBUG_POOL_SIZE && obj_cache)
+	if (obj_pool_free > debug_objects_pool_size && obj_cache)
 		sched = 1;
 	hlist_add_head(&obj->node, &obj_pool);
 	obj_pool_free++;
@@ -1126,4 +1129,11 @@ void __init debug_objects_mem_init(void)
 		pr_warn("out of memory.\n");
 	} else
 		debug_objects_selftest();
+
+	/*
+	 * Increase the thresholds for allocating and freeing objects
+	 * according to the number of possible CPUs available in the system.
+	 */
+	debug_objects_pool_size += num_possible_cpus() * 32;
+	debug_objects_pool_min_level += num_possible_cpus() * 4;
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-04 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-05 20:17 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] debugobjects: Reduce global pool_lock contention Waiman Long
2017-01-05 20:17 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] debugobjects: Track number of kmem_cache_alloc/kmem_cache_free done Waiman Long
2017-02-04 16:22   ` [tip:core/debugobjects] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2017-02-05 10:08     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-05 20:17 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] debugobjects: Scale thresholds with # of CPUs Waiman Long
2017-02-04 16:23   ` tip-bot for Waiman Long [this message]
2017-01-05 20:17 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] debugobjects: Reduce contention on the global pool_lock Waiman Long
2017-02-04 16:23   ` [tip:core/debugobjects] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2017-02-05 10:03     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-06 22:09       ` Waiman Long
2017-02-06 22:50         ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-05 16:13   ` tip-bot for Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-97dd552eb23c83dbf626a6e84666c7e281375d47@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=changbin.du@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).