From: tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, bp@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
tv@lio96.de
Subject: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Rename local variables of type struct mc_saved_data
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 04:22:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-bd6fe58d8e60d45c80ed664a55ef0df5fa076014@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454499225-21544-8-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>
Commit-ID: bd6fe58d8e60d45c80ed664a55ef0df5fa076014
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/bd6fe58d8e60d45c80ed664a55ef0df5fa076014
Author: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:33:35 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:41:16 +0100
x86/microcode/intel: Rename local variables of type struct mc_saved_data
So it is always a head-twister when trying to stare at code which has a
bunch of
struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data;
local function variables *and* a global mc_saved_data of the same name.
Rename all locals to "mcs" to differentiate from the global one.
No functionality change.
Tested-by: Thomas Voegtle <tv@lio96.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454499225-21544-8-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index f4bc5fe..4af30bee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -89,42 +89,39 @@ copy_initrd_ptrs(struct microcode_intel **mc_saved, unsigned long *initrd,
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
static void
-microcode_phys(struct microcode_intel **mc_saved_tmp,
- struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data)
+microcode_phys(struct microcode_intel **mc_saved_tmp, struct mc_saved_data *mcs)
{
int i;
struct microcode_intel ***mc_saved;
- mc_saved = (struct microcode_intel ***)
- __pa_nodebug(&mc_saved_data->mc_saved);
- for (i = 0; i < mc_saved_data->mc_saved_count; i++) {
+ mc_saved = (struct microcode_intel ***)__pa_nodebug(&mcs->mc_saved);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mcs->mc_saved_count; i++) {
struct microcode_intel *p;
- p = *(struct microcode_intel **)
- __pa_nodebug(mc_saved_data->mc_saved + i);
+ p = *(struct microcode_intel **)__pa_nodebug(mcs->mc_saved + i);
mc_saved_tmp[i] = (struct microcode_intel *)__pa_nodebug(p);
}
}
#endif
static enum ucode_state
-load_microcode(struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data, unsigned long *initrd,
+load_microcode(struct mc_saved_data *mcs, unsigned long *initrd,
unsigned long initrd_start, struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
{
struct microcode_intel *mc_saved_tmp[MAX_UCODE_COUNT];
- unsigned int count = mc_saved_data->mc_saved_count;
+ unsigned int count = mcs->mc_saved_count;
- if (!mc_saved_data->mc_saved) {
+ if (!mcs->mc_saved) {
copy_initrd_ptrs(mc_saved_tmp, initrd, initrd_start, count);
return load_microcode_early(mc_saved_tmp, count, uci);
} else {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
- microcode_phys(mc_saved_tmp, mc_saved_data);
+ microcode_phys(mc_saved_tmp, mcs);
return load_microcode_early(mc_saved_tmp, count, uci);
#else
- return load_microcode_early(mc_saved_data->mc_saved,
- count, uci);
+ return load_microcode_early(mcs->mc_saved, count, uci);
#endif
}
}
@@ -175,7 +172,7 @@ matching_model_microcode(struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header,
}
static int
-save_microcode(struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data,
+save_microcode(struct mc_saved_data *mcs,
struct microcode_intel **mc_saved_src,
unsigned int mc_saved_count)
{
@@ -219,8 +216,8 @@ save_microcode(struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data,
/*
* Point to newly saved microcode.
*/
- mc_saved_data->mc_saved = saved_ptr;
- mc_saved_data->mc_saved_count = mc_saved_count;
+ mcs->mc_saved = saved_ptr;
+ mcs->mc_saved_count = mc_saved_count;
return 0;
@@ -286,7 +283,7 @@ static unsigned int _save_mc(struct microcode_intel **mc_saved,
static enum ucode_state __init
get_matching_model_microcode(int cpu, unsigned long start,
void *data, size_t size,
- struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data,
+ struct mc_saved_data *mcs,
unsigned long *mc_saved_in_initrd,
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
{
@@ -296,7 +293,7 @@ get_matching_model_microcode(int cpu, unsigned long start,
unsigned int mc_size;
struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header;
struct microcode_intel *mc_saved_tmp[MAX_UCODE_COUNT];
- unsigned int mc_saved_count = mc_saved_data->mc_saved_count;
+ unsigned int mc_saved_count = mcs->mc_saved_count;
int i;
while (leftover && mc_saved_count < ARRAY_SIZE(mc_saved_tmp)) {
@@ -342,7 +339,7 @@ get_matching_model_microcode(int cpu, unsigned long start,
for (i = 0; i < mc_saved_count; i++)
mc_saved_in_initrd[i] = (unsigned long)mc_saved_tmp[i] - start;
- mc_saved_data->mc_saved_count = mc_saved_count;
+ mcs->mc_saved_count = mc_saved_count;
out:
return state;
}
@@ -536,7 +533,7 @@ static bool __init load_builtin_intel_microcode(struct cpio_data *cp)
static __initdata char ucode_name[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin";
static __init enum ucode_state
-scan_microcode(struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data, unsigned long *initrd,
+scan_microcode(struct mc_saved_data *mcs, unsigned long *initrd,
unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
{
@@ -562,7 +559,7 @@ scan_microcode(struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data, unsigned long *initrd,
}
return get_matching_model_microcode(0, start, cd.data, cd.size,
- mc_saved_data, initrd, uci);
+ mcs, initrd, uci);
}
/*
@@ -702,8 +699,7 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void)
}
static void __init
-_load_ucode_intel_bsp(struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data,
- unsigned long *initrd,
+_load_ucode_intel_bsp(struct mc_saved_data *mcs, unsigned long *initrd,
unsigned long start, unsigned long size)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info uci;
@@ -711,11 +707,11 @@ _load_ucode_intel_bsp(struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data,
collect_cpu_info_early(&uci);
- ret = scan_microcode(mc_saved_data, initrd, start, size, &uci);
+ ret = scan_microcode(mcs, initrd, start, size, &uci);
if (ret != UCODE_OK)
return;
- ret = load_microcode(mc_saved_data, initrd, start, &uci);
+ ret = load_microcode(mcs, initrd, start, &uci);
if (ret != UCODE_OK)
return;
@@ -750,28 +746,28 @@ void __init load_ucode_intel_bsp(void)
void load_ucode_intel_ap(void)
{
- struct mc_saved_data *mc_saved_data_p;
- struct ucode_cpu_info uci;
unsigned long *mc_saved_in_initrd_p;
+ struct mc_saved_data *mcs_p;
+ struct ucode_cpu_info uci;
enum ucode_state ret;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
mc_saved_in_initrd_p = (unsigned long *)__pa_nodebug(mc_saved_in_initrd);
- mc_saved_data_p = (struct mc_saved_data *)__pa_nodebug(&mc_saved_data);
+ mcs_p = (struct mc_saved_data *)__pa_nodebug(&mc_saved_data);
#else
mc_saved_in_initrd_p = mc_saved_in_initrd;
- mc_saved_data_p = &mc_saved_data;
+ mcs_p = &mc_saved_data;
#endif
/*
* If there is no valid ucode previously saved in memory, no need to
* update ucode on this AP.
*/
- if (mc_saved_data_p->mc_saved_count == 0)
+ if (mcs_p->mc_saved_count == 0)
return;
collect_cpu_info_early(&uci);
- ret = load_microcode(mc_saved_data_p, mc_saved_in_initrd_p,
+ ret = load_microcode(mcs_p, mc_saved_in_initrd_p,
get_initrd_start_addr(), &uci);
if (ret != UCODE_OK)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-09 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-03 11:33 [PATCH 00/17] x86/microcode: Untangle loader from BLK_DEV_INITRD Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 01/17] x86/microcode: Untangle " Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:20 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 02/17] x86/microcode/intel: Make early loader look for builtin microcode too Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:20 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 03/17] x86/microcode: Remove redundant __setup() param parsing Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:21 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 04/17] x86/microcode: Remove an unneeded NULL check Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20140120103046.GC14233@elgon.mountain>
2016-02-09 12:21 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Dan Carpenter
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 05/17] x86/microcode: Issue update message only once Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:21 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 06/17] x86/microcode/AMD: Drop redundant printk prefix Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:22 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 07/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename local variables of type struct mc_saved_data Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:22 ` tip-bot for Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 08/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_saved_count to num_saved Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:22 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 09/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_intel variable to mc Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:23 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 10/17] x86/microcode/intel: Move the BUG_ON up and turn it into WARN_ON Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:23 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 11/17] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup apply_microcode_intel() Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:24 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 12/17] x86/microcode/intel: Use *wrmsrl variants Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:24 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 13/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_saved_in_initrd Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:24 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 14/17] x86/microcode/intel: Remove unused arg of get_matching_model_microcode() Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:25 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 15/17] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup get_matching_model_microcode() Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:25 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 16/17] x86/microcode/AMD: Issue microcode updated message later Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:25 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 17/17] x86/microcode: Document builtin microcode loading method Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:26 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-bd6fe58d8e60d45c80ed664a55ef0df5fa076014@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tv@lio96.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).