From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752197AbdANMcb (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:32:31 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:51022 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752041AbdANMc1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:32:27 -0500 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 04:31:27 -0800 From: tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso Message-ID: Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dbueso@suse.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dave@stgolabs.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org, dbueso@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: <1483479794-14013-4-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> References: <1483479794-14013-4-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: [tip:locking/core] kernel/locking: Compute 'current' directly Git-Commit-ID: d269a8b8c57523a2e328c1ff44fe791e13df3d37 X-Mailer: tip-git-log-daemon Robot-ID: Robot-Unsubscribe: Contact to get blacklisted from these emails MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Commit-ID: d269a8b8c57523a2e328c1ff44fe791e13df3d37 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d269a8b8c57523a2e328c1ff44fe791e13df3d37 Author: Davidlohr Bueso AuthorDate: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:43:13 -0800 Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:14:14 +0100 kernel/locking: Compute 'current' directly This patch effectively replaces the tsk pointer dereference (which is obviously == current), to directly use get_current() macro. This is to make the removal of setting foreign task states smoother and painfully obvious. Performance win on some archs such as x86-64 and ppc64. On a microbenchmark that calls set_task_state() vs set_current_state() and an inode rwsem pounding benchmark doing unlink: == 1. x86-64 == Avg runtime set_task_state(): 601 msecs Avg runtime set_current_state(): 552 msecs vanilla dirty Hmean unlink1-processes-2 36089.26 ( 0.00%) 38977.33 ( 8.00%) Hmean unlink1-processes-5 28555.01 ( 0.00%) 29832.55 ( 4.28%) Hmean unlink1-processes-8 37323.75 ( 0.00%) 44974.57 ( 20.50%) Hmean unlink1-processes-12 43571.88 ( 0.00%) 44283.01 ( 1.63%) Hmean unlink1-processes-21 34431.52 ( 0.00%) 38284.45 ( 11.19%) Hmean unlink1-processes-30 34813.26 ( 0.00%) 37975.17 ( 9.08%) Hmean unlink1-processes-48 37048.90 ( 0.00%) 39862.78 ( 7.59%) Hmean unlink1-processes-79 35630.01 ( 0.00%) 36855.30 ( 3.44%) Hmean unlink1-processes-110 36115.85 ( 0.00%) 39843.91 ( 10.32%) Hmean unlink1-processes-141 32546.96 ( 0.00%) 35418.52 ( 8.82%) Hmean unlink1-processes-172 34674.79 ( 0.00%) 36899.21 ( 6.42%) Hmean unlink1-processes-203 37303.11 ( 0.00%) 36393.04 ( -2.44%) Hmean unlink1-processes-224 35712.13 ( 0.00%) 36685.96 ( 2.73%) == 2. ppc64le == Avg runtime set_task_state(): 938 msecs Avg runtime set_current_state: 940 msecs vanilla dirty Hmean unlink1-processes-2 19269.19 ( 0.00%) 30704.50 ( 59.35%) Hmean unlink1-processes-5 20106.15 ( 0.00%) 21804.15 ( 8.45%) Hmean unlink1-processes-8 17496.97 ( 0.00%) 17243.28 ( -1.45%) Hmean unlink1-processes-12 14224.15 ( 0.00%) 17240.21 ( 21.20%) Hmean unlink1-processes-21 14155.66 ( 0.00%) 15681.23 ( 10.78%) Hmean unlink1-processes-30 14450.70 ( 0.00%) 15995.83 ( 10.69%) Hmean unlink1-processes-48 16945.57 ( 0.00%) 16370.42 ( -3.39%) Hmean unlink1-processes-79 15788.39 ( 0.00%) 14639.27 ( -7.28%) Hmean unlink1-processes-110 14268.48 ( 0.00%) 14377.40 ( 0.76%) Hmean unlink1-processes-141 14023.65 ( 0.00%) 16271.69 ( 16.03%) Hmean unlink1-processes-172 13417.62 ( 0.00%) 16067.55 ( 19.75%) Hmean unlink1-processes-203 15293.08 ( 0.00%) 15440.40 ( 0.96%) Hmean unlink1-processes-234 13719.32 ( 0.00%) 16190.74 ( 18.01%) Hmean unlink1-processes-265 16400.97 ( 0.00%) 16115.22 ( -1.74%) Hmean unlink1-processes-296 14388.60 ( 0.00%) 16216.13 ( 12.70%) Hmean unlink1-processes-320 15771.85 ( 0.00%) 15905.96 ( 0.85%) Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1483479794-14013-4-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/locking/mutex.c | 19 +++++++++---------- kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 18 +++++++----------- kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 7 +++---- kernel/locking/semaphore.c | 7 +++---- 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index 9b34961..4c7d043 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -622,7 +622,6 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, const bool use_ww_ctx) { - struct task_struct *task = current; struct mutex_waiter waiter; unsigned long flags; bool first = false; @@ -656,18 +655,18 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, goto skip_wait; debug_mutex_lock_common(lock, &waiter); - debug_mutex_add_waiter(lock, &waiter, task); + debug_mutex_add_waiter(lock, &waiter, current); /* add waiting tasks to the end of the waitqueue (FIFO): */ list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &lock->wait_list); - waiter.task = task; + waiter.task = current; if (__mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter)) __mutex_set_flag(lock, MUTEX_FLAG_WAITERS); lock_contended(&lock->dep_map, ip); - set_task_state(task, state); + set_task_state(current, state); for (;;) { /* * Once we hold wait_lock, we're serialized against @@ -683,7 +682,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * wait_lock. This ensures the lock cancellation is ordered * against mutex_unlock() and wake-ups do not go missing. */ - if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(state, task))) { + if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(state, current))) { ret = -EINTR; goto err; } @@ -702,7 +701,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, __mutex_set_flag(lock, MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF); } - set_task_state(task, state); + set_task_state(current, state); /* * Here we order against unlock; we must either see it change * state back to RUNNING and fall through the next schedule(), @@ -716,9 +715,9 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, } spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags); acquired: - __set_task_state(task, TASK_RUNNING); + __set_task_state(current, TASK_RUNNING); - mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter, task); + mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter, current); if (likely(list_empty(&lock->wait_list))) __mutex_clear_flag(lock, MUTEX_FLAGS); @@ -736,8 +735,8 @@ skip_wait: return 0; err: - __set_task_state(task, TASK_RUNNING); - mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter, task); + __set_task_state(current, TASK_RUNNING); + mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter, current); spin_unlock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags); debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, ip); diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c index 1591f6b..60d15d3 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c @@ -128,7 +128,6 @@ __rwsem_wake_one_writer(struct rw_semaphore *sem) void __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) { struct rwsem_waiter waiter; - struct task_struct *tsk; unsigned long flags; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags); @@ -140,13 +139,12 @@ void __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) goto out; } - tsk = current; - set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + set_task_state(current, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); /* set up my own style of waitqueue */ - waiter.task = tsk; + waiter.task = current; waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ; - get_task_struct(tsk); + get_task_struct(current); list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list); @@ -158,10 +156,10 @@ void __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) if (!waiter.task) break; schedule(); - set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + set_task_state(current, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); } - __set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING); + __set_task_state(current, TASK_RUNNING); out: ; } @@ -194,15 +192,13 @@ int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state) { struct rwsem_waiter waiter; - struct task_struct *tsk; unsigned long flags; int ret = 0; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags); /* set up my own style of waitqueue */ - tsk = current; - waiter.task = tsk; + waiter.task = current; waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE; list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list); @@ -220,7 +216,7 @@ int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state) ret = -EINTR; goto out; } - set_task_state(tsk, state); + set_task_state(current, state); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags); schedule(); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags); diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c index 6315060..d3b819c 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c @@ -224,10 +224,9 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem) { long count, adjustment = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS; struct rwsem_waiter waiter; - struct task_struct *tsk = current; DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); - waiter.task = tsk; + waiter.task = current; waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ; raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); @@ -254,13 +253,13 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem) /* wait to be given the lock */ while (true) { - set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + set_task_state(current, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); if (!waiter.task) break; schedule(); } - __set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING); + __set_task_state(current, TASK_RUNNING); return sem; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_down_read_failed); diff --git a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c index b8120ab..29aac9f 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c +++ b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c @@ -204,19 +204,18 @@ struct semaphore_waiter { static inline int __sched __down_common(struct semaphore *sem, long state, long timeout) { - struct task_struct *task = current; struct semaphore_waiter waiter; list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list); - waiter.task = task; + waiter.task = current; waiter.up = false; for (;;) { - if (signal_pending_state(state, task)) + if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) goto interrupted; if (unlikely(timeout <= 0)) goto timed_out; - __set_task_state(task, state); + __set_task_state(current, state); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->lock); timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout); raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->lock);