linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	hpa@zytor.com
Subject: [tip:locking/core] stop_machine: Use raw spinlocks
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 05:40:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-de5b55c1d4e30740009864eb35ce4ed856aac01d@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180423191635.6014-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Commit-ID:  de5b55c1d4e30740009864eb35ce4ed856aac01d
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/de5b55c1d4e30740009864eb35ce4ed856aac01d
Author:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
AuthorDate: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 21:16:35 +0200
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:34:51 +0200

stop_machine: Use raw spinlocks

Use raw-locks in stop_machine() to allow locking in irq-off and
preempt-disabled regions on -RT. This also documents the possible locking
context in general.

[bigeasy: update patch description.]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180423191635.6014-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de

---
 kernel/stop_machine.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index b7591261652d..c25ba18274fb 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct cpu_stop_done {
 struct cpu_stopper {
 	struct task_struct	*thread;
 
-	spinlock_t		lock;
+	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
 	bool			enabled;	/* is this stopper enabled? */
 	struct list_head	works;		/* list of pending works */
 
@@ -78,13 +78,13 @@ static bool cpu_stop_queue_work(unsigned int cpu, struct cpu_stop_work *work)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool enabled;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&stopper->lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&stopper->lock, flags);
 	enabled = stopper->enabled;
 	if (enabled)
 		__cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper, work);
 	else if (work->done)
 		cpu_stop_signal_done(work->done);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stopper->lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stopper->lock, flags);
 
 	return enabled;
 }
@@ -231,8 +231,8 @@ static int cpu_stop_queue_two_works(int cpu1, struct cpu_stop_work *work1,
 	struct cpu_stopper *stopper2 = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_stopper, cpu2);
 	int err;
 retry:
-	spin_lock_irq(&stopper1->lock);
-	spin_lock_nested(&stopper2->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&stopper1->lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_nested(&stopper2->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 
 	err = -ENOENT;
 	if (!stopper1->enabled || !stopper2->enabled)
@@ -255,8 +255,8 @@ retry:
 	__cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper1, work1);
 	__cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper2, work2);
 unlock:
-	spin_unlock(&stopper2->lock);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&stopper1->lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&stopper2->lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&stopper1->lock);
 
 	if (unlikely(err == -EDEADLK)) {
 		while (stop_cpus_in_progress)
@@ -448,9 +448,9 @@ static int cpu_stop_should_run(unsigned int cpu)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int run;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&stopper->lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&stopper->lock, flags);
 	run = !list_empty(&stopper->works);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stopper->lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stopper->lock, flags);
 	return run;
 }
 
@@ -461,13 +461,13 @@ static void cpu_stopper_thread(unsigned int cpu)
 
 repeat:
 	work = NULL;
-	spin_lock_irq(&stopper->lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&stopper->lock);
 	if (!list_empty(&stopper->works)) {
 		work = list_first_entry(&stopper->works,
 					struct cpu_stop_work, list);
 		list_del_init(&work->list);
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irq(&stopper->lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&stopper->lock);
 
 	if (work) {
 		cpu_stop_fn_t fn = work->fn;
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int __init cpu_stop_init(void)
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		struct cpu_stopper *stopper = &per_cpu(cpu_stopper, cpu);
 
-		spin_lock_init(&stopper->lock);
+		raw_spin_lock_init(&stopper->lock);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&stopper->works);
 	}
 

      reply	other threads:[~2018-04-27 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-23 19:16 [PATCH] stop_machine: Use raw spinlocks Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-04-27 12:40 ` tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-de5b55c1d4e30740009864eb35ce4ed856aac01d@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).