From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
efault@gmx.de, npiggin@kernel.dk, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, frank.rowand@am.sony.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/locking] sched: Provide p->on_rq
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:33:45 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-fd2f4419b4cbe8fe90796df9617c355762afd6a4@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110405152728.949545047@chello.nl>
Commit-ID: fd2f4419b4cbe8fe90796df9617c355762afd6a4
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/fd2f4419b4cbe8fe90796df9617c355762afd6a4
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
AuthorDate: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:23:44 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:52:35 +0200
sched: Provide p->on_rq
Provide a generic p->on_rq because the p->se.on_rq semantics are
unfavourable for lockless wakeups but needed for sched_fair.
In particular, p->on_rq is only cleared when we actually dequeue the
task in schedule() and not on any random dequeue as done by things
like __migrate_task() and __sched_setscheduler().
This also allows us to remove p->se usage from !sched_fair code.
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110405152728.949545047@chello.nl
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
kernel/sched_debug.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched_rt.c | 16 ++++++++--------
kernel/sched_stoptask.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 1738504..b33a700 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1202,6 +1202,7 @@ struct task_struct {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int on_cpu;
#endif
+ int on_rq;
int prio, static_prio, normal_prio;
unsigned int rt_priority;
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 4481638..dece28e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1785,7 +1785,6 @@ static void enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
update_rq_clock(rq);
sched_info_queued(p);
p->sched_class->enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);
- p->se.on_rq = 1;
}
static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
@@ -1793,7 +1792,6 @@ static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
update_rq_clock(rq);
sched_info_dequeued(p);
p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
- p->se.on_rq = 0;
}
/*
@@ -2128,7 +2126,7 @@ static void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
* A queue event has occurred, and we're going to schedule. In
* this case, we can save a useless back to back clock update.
*/
- if (rq->curr->se.on_rq && test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr))
+ if (rq->curr->on_rq && test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr))
rq->skip_clock_update = 1;
}
@@ -2203,7 +2201,7 @@ static bool migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
* If the task is not on a runqueue (and not running), then
* the next wake-up will properly place the task.
*/
- return p->se.on_rq || task_running(rq, p);
+ return p->on_rq || task_running(rq, p);
}
/*
@@ -2263,7 +2261,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state)
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
trace_sched_wait_task(p);
running = task_running(rq, p);
- on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
+ on_rq = p->on_rq;
ncsw = 0;
if (!match_state || p->state == match_state)
ncsw = p->nvcsw | LONG_MIN; /* sets MSB */
@@ -2444,6 +2442,7 @@ ttwu_stat(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
static void ttwu_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int en_flags)
{
activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
+ p->on_rq = 1;
/* if a worker is waking up, notify workqueue */
if (p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
@@ -2506,7 +2505,7 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state,
cpu = task_cpu(p);
- if (p->se.on_rq)
+ if (p->on_rq)
goto out_running;
orig_cpu = cpu;
@@ -2583,7 +2582,7 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p)
if (!(p->state & TASK_NORMAL))
return;
- if (!p->se.on_rq)
+ if (!p->on_rq)
ttwu_activate(rq, p, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
ttwu_post_activation(p, rq, 0);
@@ -2620,19 +2619,21 @@ int wake_up_state(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state)
*/
static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
{
+ p->on_rq = 0;
+
+ p->se.on_rq = 0;
p->se.exec_start = 0;
p->se.sum_exec_runtime = 0;
p->se.prev_sum_exec_runtime = 0;
p->se.nr_migrations = 0;
p->se.vruntime = 0;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->se.group_node);
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
memset(&p->se.statistics, 0, sizeof(p->se.statistics));
#endif
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rt.run_list);
- p->se.on_rq = 0;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->se.group_node);
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&p->preempt_notifiers);
@@ -2750,6 +2751,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
activate_task(rq, p, 0);
+ p->on_rq = 1;
trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, true);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -4051,7 +4053,7 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev)
static void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
- if (prev->se.on_rq)
+ if (prev->on_rq)
update_rq_clock(rq);
prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
}
@@ -4126,7 +4128,9 @@ need_resched:
if (to_wakeup)
try_to_wake_up_local(to_wakeup);
}
+
deactivate_task(rq, prev, DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
+ prev->on_rq = 0;
/*
* If we are going to sleep and we have plugged IO queued, make
@@ -4695,7 +4699,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
trace_sched_pi_setprio(p, prio);
oldprio = p->prio;
prev_class = p->sched_class;
- on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
+ on_rq = p->on_rq;
running = task_current(rq, p);
if (on_rq)
dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
@@ -4743,7 +4747,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
goto out_unlock;
}
- on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
+ on_rq = p->on_rq;
if (on_rq)
dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
@@ -4877,8 +4881,6 @@ static struct task_struct *find_process_by_pid(pid_t pid)
static void
__setscheduler(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int policy, int prio)
{
- BUG_ON(p->se.on_rq);
-
p->policy = policy;
p->rt_priority = prio;
p->normal_prio = normal_prio(p);
@@ -5044,7 +5046,7 @@ recheck:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
goto recheck;
}
- on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
+ on_rq = p->on_rq;
running = task_current(rq, p);
if (on_rq)
deactivate_task(rq, p, 0);
@@ -5965,7 +5967,7 @@ static int __migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dest_cpu)
* If we're not on a rq, the next wake-up will ensure we're
* placed properly.
*/
- if (p->se.on_rq) {
+ if (p->on_rq) {
deactivate_task(rq_src, p, 0);
set_task_cpu(p, dest_cpu);
activate_task(rq_dest, p, 0);
@@ -8339,7 +8341,7 @@ static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
int old_prio = p->prio;
int on_rq;
- on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
+ on_rq = p->on_rq;
if (on_rq)
deactivate_task(rq, p, 0);
__setscheduler(rq, p, SCHED_NORMAL, 0);
@@ -8682,7 +8684,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
rq = task_rq_lock(tsk, &flags);
running = task_current(rq, tsk);
- on_rq = tsk->se.on_rq;
+ on_rq = tsk->on_rq;
if (on_rq)
dequeue_task(rq, tsk, 0);
diff --git a/kernel/sched_debug.c b/kernel/sched_debug.c
index 7bacd83..3669bec6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_debug.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static void print_rq(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, int rq_cpu)
read_lock_irqsave(&tasklist_lock, flags);
do_each_thread(g, p) {
- if (!p->se.on_rq || task_cpu(p) != rq_cpu)
+ if (!p->on_rq || task_cpu(p) != rq_cpu)
continue;
print_task(m, rq, p);
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index e7cebdc..9ca4f5f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
* The previous task needs to be made eligible for pushing
* if it is still active
*/
- if (p->se.on_rq && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
+ if (on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
}
@@ -1287,7 +1287,7 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
!cpumask_test_cpu(lowest_rq->cpu,
&task->cpus_allowed) ||
task_running(rq, task) ||
- !task->se.on_rq)) {
+ !task->on_rq)) {
raw_spin_unlock(&lowest_rq->lock);
lowest_rq = NULL;
@@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_pushable_task(struct rq *rq)
BUG_ON(task_current(rq, p));
BUG_ON(p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed <= 1);
- BUG_ON(!p->se.on_rq);
+ BUG_ON(!p->on_rq);
BUG_ON(!rt_task(p));
return p;
@@ -1467,7 +1467,7 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
*/
if (p && (p->prio < this_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr)) {
WARN_ON(p == src_rq->curr);
- WARN_ON(!p->se.on_rq);
+ WARN_ON(!p->on_rq);
/*
* There's a chance that p is higher in priority
@@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@ static void set_cpus_allowed_rt(struct task_struct *p,
* Update the migration status of the RQ if we have an RT task
* which is running AND changing its weight value.
*/
- if (p->se.on_rq && (weight != p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed)) {
+ if (p->on_rq && (weight != p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed)) {
struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
if (!task_current(rq, p)) {
@@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ static void switched_from_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
* we may need to handle the pulling of RT tasks
* now.
*/
- if (p->se.on_rq && !rq->rt.rt_nr_running)
+ if (p->on_rq && !rq->rt.rt_nr_running)
pull_rt_task(rq);
}
@@ -1638,7 +1638,7 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
* If that current running task is also an RT task
* then see if we can move to another run queue.
*/
- if (p->se.on_rq && rq->curr != p) {
+ if (p->on_rq && rq->curr != p) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (rq->rt.overloaded && push_rt_task(rq) &&
/* Don't resched if we changed runqueues */
@@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
static void
prio_changed_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
{
- if (!p->se.on_rq)
+ if (!p->on_rq)
return;
if (rq->curr == p) {
diff --git a/kernel/sched_stoptask.c b/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
index 1ba2bd4..f607de4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *stop = rq->stop;
- if (stop && stop->se.on_rq)
+ if (stop && stop->on_rq)
return stop;
return NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-14 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 152+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-05 15:23 [PATCH 00/21] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v6 Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 01/21] sched: Provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule() Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 21:15 ` Tony Luck
2011-04-13 21:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:31 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 02/21] sched: Always provide p->on_cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:31 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 03/21] mutex: Use p->on_cpu for the adaptive spin Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:32 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 04/21] sched: Change the ttwu success details Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 18:39 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-13 19:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:32 ` [tip:sched/locking] sched: Change the ttwu() " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 05/21] sched: Clean up ttwu stats Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:33 ` [tip:sched/locking] sched: Clean up ttwu() stats tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 06/21] sched: Provide p->on_rq Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:33 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 07/21] sched: Serialize p->cpus_allowed and ttwu() using p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:34 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 08/21] sched: Drop the rq argument to sched_class::select_task_rq() Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:34 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 09/21] sched: Remove rq argument to sched_class::task_waking() Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:35 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 10/21] sched: Deal with non-atomic min_vruntime reads on 32bits Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:35 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 11/21] sched: Delay task_contributes_to_load() Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:35 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 12/21] sched: Also serialize ttwu_local() with p->pi_lock Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:36 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 13/21] sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:36 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-01 13:58 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-01 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-01 17:20 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-01 18:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-01 18:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-01 19:30 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-01 21:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-03 9:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-03 10:02 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-03 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-03 11:52 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 8:53 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 9:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 9:43 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 9:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 10:22 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 11:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 11:19 ` [debug patch] printk: Add a printk killswitch to robustify NMI watchdog messages Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 11:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 11:57 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 13:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 13:54 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 14:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 14:45 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 14:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 14:31 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 15:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 15:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 15:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 16:07 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 16:35 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 16:50 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 17:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 17:42 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 18:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 19:30 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 19:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-05 20:15 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-06 6:56 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-06 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 9:18 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-06 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 9:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 10:00 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-06 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 15:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 15:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 17:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-06-07 5:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-06-06 13:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 13:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 7:34 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 15:34 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-06 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 14:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 15:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 16:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 16:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 16:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 16:38 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-06 16:45 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-06 16:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 17:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-08 15:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-08 19:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-08 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-08 20:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-08 20:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-08 20:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-08 19:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-08 20:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-08 21:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-08 21:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-06 16:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 17:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 17:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 17:57 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-06 18:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-06 18:14 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-06 18:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 22:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-03 12:44 ` [tip:sched/locking] sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock() Linus Torvalds
2011-06-03 13:05 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-04 21:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-04 22:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-04 22:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-05 6:01 ` Arne Jansen
2011-06-05 7:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 14/21] sched: Drop rq->lock from first part of wake_up_new_task() Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:37 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 15/21] sched: Drop rq->lock from sched_exec() Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:37 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 16/21] sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu() Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:38 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 17/21] sched: Remove rq argument from ttwu_stat() Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:38 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 18/21] sched: Rename ttwu_post_activation Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:39 ` [tip:sched/locking] sched: Rename ttwu_post_activation() to ttwu_do_wakeup() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 19/21] sched: Restructure ttwu some more Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:39 ` [tip:sched/locking] sched: Restructure ttwu() " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 20/21] sched: Move the second half of ttwu() to the remote cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:39 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:23 ` [PATCH 21/21] sched: Remove need_migrate_task() Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 8:40 ` [tip:sched/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 15:59 ` [PATCH 00/21] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v6 Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-27 16:54 ` Dave Kleikamp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-fd2f4419b4cbe8fe90796df9617c355762afd6a4@git.kernel.org \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).