From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753956Ab3JXHqZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:46:25 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:59218 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751156Ab3JXHqY (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:46:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: From: "Peter Huewe" To: "Jason Gunthorpe" Cc: "Ashley Lai" , "Rajiv Andrade" , tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Aw: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: MAINTAINERS: Add myself as tpm maintainer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:46:22 +0200 (CEST) Importance: normal Sensitivity: Normal In-Reply-To: <20131024041620.GA32346@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1382463410-2018-1-git-send-email-peterhuewe@gmx.de> <20131022205205.GA2374@obsidianresearch.com> <20131024032736.GC30090@obsidianresearch.com> <1382587279.5587.9.camel@fishsauce>, <20131024041620.GA32346@obsidianresearch.com> X-UI-Message-Type: mail X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:RkyoQR4nTk5QfX7mkUaAmpvK7jkVp7zR72DVqpSQJ+y xI/OrD4gmO0mmlgxsn0vFWDRr94etYEqCueloFSJD49dtYnvkm takYrjDHwP6kN9KLWukScY2fiBkyKwDQ+1phzLMDIZ3Uw++KKA dJYXO1rbEdCg2r+VDpsMLpBm7mxnOQioy/rYVOSeYQqf8PmFNe ghQubcZTuoKz0/+803PEdxxewUFy/iK7AVIAhrsVPYMUVhmduo U3+MPaxGgQ1Cpw5SNXQGg5wVAWamxj6ulp8rHj4Y6P5/+wtRf0 XxNI+M= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jason, > > Speaking of which, has anyone looked at the rest of my series?? Shall > > I repost it? > Jason Gunthorpe: > tpm: Pull everything related to /dev/tpmX into tpm-dev.c > tpm: Pull everything related to sysfs into tpm-sysfs.c > tpm: Create a tpm_class_ops structure and use it in the drivers > tpm: Use the ops structure instead of a copy in tpm_vendor_specific > tpm: Make tpm-dev allocate a per-file structure > Peter's checkpatch clean up will create some minor conflicts, so I > should probably resend the lot after rebasing it. Yeah that would be nice. I did have a look at them, but not as close as I wanted to, yet ;( Since they are making some major changes to the tpm subsystem I did not want to hurry them in for 3.12, but give them a rather good testing on my machines as well. (I know you did test them ;) Unfortunately due to a lot of traveling that was not possible for me. So please repost them, so we can make them ready for 3.13. Thanks, Peter