From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758085AbaFYR6G (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:58:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]:52857 "EHLO mail-pb0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757825AbaFYR6C (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:58:02 -0400 From: bsegall@google.com To: Kirill Tkhai Cc: , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , , Srikar Dronamraju , "Mike Galbraith" , , Paul Turner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] sched/fair: Disable runtime_enabled on dying rq References: <20140625081502.2861.12526.stgit@tkhai> <1403684382.3462.42.camel@tkhai> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:57:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1403684382.3462.42.camel@tkhai> (Kirill Tkhai's message of "Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:19:42 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kirill Tkhai writes: > We kill rq->rd on the CPU_DOWN_PREPARE stage: > > cpuset_cpu_inactive -> cpuset_update_active_cpus -> partition_sched_domains -> > -> cpu_attach_domain -> rq_attach_root -> set_rq_offline > > This unthrottles all throttled cfs_rqs. > > But the cpu is still able to call schedule() till > > take_cpu_down->__cpu_disable() > > is called from stop_machine. > > This case the tasks from just unthrottled cfs_rqs are pickable > in a standard scheduler way, and they are picked by dying cpu. > The cfs_rqs becomes throttled again, and migrate_tasks() > in migration_call skips their tasks (one more unthrottle > in migrate_tasks()->CPU_DYING does not happen, because rq->rd > is already NULL). > > Patch sets runtime_enabled to zero. This guarantees, the runtime > is not accounted, and the cfs_rqs won't exceed given > cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = 1, and tasks will be pickable > in migrate_tasks(). runtime_enabled is recalculated again > when rq becomes online again. > > Ben Segall also noticed, we always enable runtime in > tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(). Actually, we should do that for online > cpus only. To prevent races with unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() > we take get_online_cpus() lock. > > v2: Fix race with tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(). > Move cfs_rq->runtime_enabled=0 above unthrottle_cfs_rq(). > v3: {get,put}_online_cpus() > > Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai > CC: Konstantin Khorenko > CC: Ben Segall > CC: Paul Turner > CC: Srikar Dronamraju > CC: Mike Galbraith > CC: Peter Zijlstra > CC: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Ben Segall Although #ifdefing rq->online might work too. It's possibly faster but a bit more ugly to look at, I don't care which way it is done. > --- > kernel/sched/core.c | 8 +++++++- > kernel/sched/fair.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index ceea8d0..d9c4a08 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -7807,6 +7807,11 @@ static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg, u64 period, u64 quota) > if (period > max_cfs_quota_period) > return -EINVAL; > > + /* > + * Prevent race between setting of cfs_rq->runtime_enabled and > + * unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(). > + */ > + get_online_cpus(); > mutex_lock(&cfs_constraints_mutex); > ret = __cfs_schedulable(tg, period, quota); > if (ret) > @@ -7832,7 +7837,7 @@ static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg, u64 period, u64 quota) > } > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&cfs_b->lock); > > - for_each_possible_cpu(i) { > + for_each_online_cpu(i) { > struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg->cfs_rq[i]; > struct rq *rq = cfs_rq->rq; > > @@ -7848,6 +7853,7 @@ static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg, u64 period, u64 quota) > cfs_bandwidth_usage_dec(); > out_unlock: > mutex_unlock(&cfs_constraints_mutex); > + put_online_cpus(); > > return ret; > } > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 1f9c457..5616d23 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -3776,6 +3776,19 @@ static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b) > hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->slack_timer); > } > > +static void __maybe_unused update_runtime_enabled(struct rq *rq) > +{ > + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq; > + > + for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) { > + struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = &cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth; > + > + raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock); > + cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = cfs_b->quota != RUNTIME_INF; > + raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock); > + } > +} > + > static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq) > { > struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq; > @@ -3789,6 +3802,12 @@ static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq) > * there's some valid quota amount > */ > cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = 1; > + /* > + * Offline rq is schedulable till cpu is completely disabled > + * in take_cpu_down(), so we prevent new cfs throttling here. > + */ > + cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = 0; > + > if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) > unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); > } > @@ -3832,6 +3851,7 @@ static inline struct cfs_bandwidth *tg_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg) > return NULL; > } > static inline void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b) {} > +static inline void update_runtime_enabled(struct rq *rq) {} > static inline void unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq) {} > > #endif /* CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH */ > @@ -7325,6 +7345,8 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq) > static void rq_online_fair(struct rq *rq) > { > update_sysctl(); > + > + update_runtime_enabled(rq); > } > > static void rq_offline_fair(struct rq *rq)