From: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>
To: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
songmuchun@bytedance.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: update tg->load_avg and se->load in throttle_cfs_rq()
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:30:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xm26h76wvql9.fsf@bsegall-linux.svl.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220413041627.41521-1-zhouchengming@bytedance.com> (Chengming Zhou's message of "Wed, 13 Apr 2022 12:16:27 +0800")
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> writes:
> We use update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, 0) in throttle_cfs_rq(), so the
> cfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib and task_group->load_avg won't be updated
> even when the cfs_rq's load_avg has changed.
>
> And we also don't call update_cfs_group(se), so the se->load won't
> be updated too.
>
> Change to use update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG) and add
> update_cfs_group(se) in throttle_cfs_rq(), like we do in
> dequeue_task_fair().
Hmm, this does look more correct; Vincent, was having this not do
UPDATE_TG deliberate, or an accident that we all missed when checking?
It looks like the unthrottle_cfs_rq side got UPDATE_TG added later in
the two-loops pass, but not the throttle_cfs_rq side.
Also unthrottle_cfs_rq I'm guessing could still use update_cfs_group(se)
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index d4bd299d67ab..b37dc1db7be7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4936,8 +4936,9 @@ static bool throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> if (!se->on_rq)
> goto done;
>
> - update_load_avg(qcfs_rq, se, 0);
> + update_load_avg(qcfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
> se_update_runnable(se);
> + update_cfs_group(se);
>
> if (cfs_rq_is_idle(group_cfs_rq(se)))
> idle_task_delta = cfs_rq->h_nr_running;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-13 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-13 4:16 [PATCH] sched/fair: update tg->load_avg and se->load in throttle_cfs_rq() Chengming Zhou
2022-04-13 17:30 ` Benjamin Segall [this message]
2022-04-15 5:42 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-04-15 7:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-04-18 13:20 ` Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xm26h76wvql9.fsf@bsegall-linux.svl.corp.google.com \
--to=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).