From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264140AbTH1SKW (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:10:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264143AbTH1SKW (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:10:22 -0400 Received: from greendale.ukc.ac.uk ([129.12.21.13]:18821 "EHLO greendale.ukc.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264140AbTH1SKS (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:10:18 -0400 To: Subject: Re: Spam? was: Linux 2.4.23-pre1 References: <20030828174247.GD21352@matchmail.com> From: Adam Sampson Organization: Don't wake me, 'cos I'm dreaming, and I might just stay inside again today. Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:10:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20030828174247.GD21352@matchmail.com> (Mike Fedyk's message of "Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:42:47 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-UKC-Mail-System: No virus detected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mike Fedyk writes: >> RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM (0.6 points) RBL: Received via a relay in >> relays.osirusoft.com > This was marked as spam from spamassassin. relays.osirusoft.com have closed down, and are now apparently reporting all addresses as blacklisted (which strikes me as not exactly the most user-friendly way to shut down a blacklist, but I guess they've got their reasons...). -- Adam Sampson